“That’s something that you couldn’t even try without the computer. It wouldn’t be realistic,” said Jirka. “By the time you’d figured out how that worked, that’d be months of messing around with a piece of wax. You’d have to do hundreds of iterations. When you were done, you couldn’t go, ‘What if I twisted it 15 degrees?’ That would be impossible. That’s where I think [3D printing] is most effective, is in exploring what the possibilities are.”
Jirka and Jones met at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design, where Jirka now teaches, and were married in 1980. They opened their first studio, St. Elmo’s Inc., in 1984, then moved and started Bohemiawerks in 2001. With St. Elmo’s, they worked a great deal in neon and other forms of lighting; they’ve always been interested in unconventional art forms.
“I think it’s looking for new things, but not necessarily things that other people aren’t using, because we all use so much stuff,” said Jirka.
Jirka is also fond of crafts that involve working with his hands, such as wood and metal working, but he loves the opportunities that 3D printing opens up.
“There’s something really refreshing about going through that ideation process faster, and actually being able to get product out of it,” he said. “[The software] can both limit the process and it can expand the process—it depends how tenacious you are about exploring what’s possible.”
Jirka and Jones’ work ranges from small, jewelry-like pieces to giant installations mounted on skyscrapers. Scale isn’t an issue for them, and much of their work is interactive.
Some people like to divide artists into two camps: the traditionalists, who are suspicious of new methods of creation like 3D printing, and the new crop of artists for whom art and technology are inseparable. That’s often an unfair and untrue distinction. There are plenty of artists like Jirka and Jones, who have been working in the art world for decades but who are always on the lookout for new ways to create. Despite the possibilities that 3D printing presents, Jirka does admit that there are drawbacks to the technology, such as the potential for intellectual property theft – but he has a sense of humor about the potential for his art to be reproduced.
“My dream’s always been to have something turn up at Kmart,” he said. “I can go into Kmart and buy it out of a bin.”
Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.[Source: The Growler]
You May Also Like
3D Systems Finalizes Sale of On-Demand Business, Will Operate as Quickparts
Pioneering additive manufacturing solutions provider 3D Systems finalized the $82 million deal for the sale of its on-demand 3D printing and custom manufacturing business. The rebranded company will operate as...
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: September 19, 2021
We’ve got another busy week of webinars and events to tell you about! Topics in this week’s roundup run the gamut from 3D digital textures and FDM 3D printing potential...
3D Printing News Briefs, September 18, 2021: Business, Materials, & More
We’re filling up the front of today’s 3D Printing News Briefs with plenty of business, as one company celebrates an anniversary and two others welcome new executives to their ranks....
3D Printing Service Hubs Appoints New CEO, Alex Cappy
Changes are taking place at Hubs since it was acquired by manufacturing service provider Protolabs (Nasdaq: PRLB). Not only has the subsidiary removed the “3D” from its name, but it...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.