Researchers Create Better Techniques for 3D Printing Surgical Models

Share this Article

Medical professionals and surgeons around the world have been greatly helped with the emergence and innovation of 3D printed models that not only help pinpoint a diagnosis, but also educate patients and their families regarding health issues (often regarding diseases like cancer and tumors that must be removed). Ultimately, these models can be used by surgeons to practice for delicate surgeries, and then also act as guides in the operating room.

Both US and German scientists have come together now to find improved methods of 3D printing such models and guides, publishing their findings in ‘From Improved Diagnostics to Presurgical Planning: High-Resolution Functionally Graded Multimaterial 3D Printing of Biomedical Tomographic Data Sets.’ While the authors point out how useful anatomical structures are in the medical field, they also explain why 3D printing medical models is currently rife with challenges:

“Typically, features of interest in source biomedical data sets (e.g., crosssectional raster-based biomedical images or volumes from MRI or CT DICOM files) are first isolated from the surrounding tissues, either through a time-consuming manual segmentation approach or through the use of specific intensity thresholds that best capture the feature(s) of interest,” state the authors. “The result of this filtering step is used to generate a single isosurface that is then translated into a printable format [i.e. stereolithography (.stl) file, the current standard for 3D printing workflows], which describes surface geometries through mesh representations of face vertices and normals.”

3D printing of surgical models can be flawed due to reasons like thresholding, or error in digital structure that prevent files from printing and then require users to make additional changes later. The researchers see multimaterial 3D printers as a solution due to their ability to use more than one .stl file:

“This approach greatly expands the number of different anatomical structures that can be represented by different colors or materials (e.g., through the use of multiple thresholds) and, as such, can improve the interpretive value of 3D-printed anatomical models,” state the researchers. “However, the printing of multiple nested .stl files is labor intensive, computationally expensive, and ultimately nonscalable.”

High-spatial resolution 3D-printed structural details in a pathological heart model. (A) Volumetric rendering of an infarcted heart and (B) the corresponding (cropped) 3D print of its apex, clearly showing (C) the structural organization of the superficial coronary vasculature and (D) the details of the left ventricular scar.

As a result, their study is centered around showing how functional bitmap-based workflows are helpful in fabricating biomedical data sets, permitting rapid creation of anatomical models without thresholding. The scientists also ‘bypassed’ more typical 3D printing workflows due to their potential for error, and worked with both MRI and CT data.

“Despite the advantages of this bitmap-based workflow compared with its traditional .stl-based counterpart, there are still some limitations to the technique,” concluded the researchers. “For example, although our 3D-printed models can faithfully replicate the details of their native CT or MRI source files, their ability to successfully depict anatomical features of interest is directly limited by the inherent resolution of each imaging modality.

“Inaccuracies can also be introduced by image reconstruction methods designed to optimize human image viewing rather than 3D printing, and traditional clinical tomography file compression and archival protocols will, in turn, need to be modified as biomedical 3D printing becomes more mainstream. Data set-specific issues also arise with regard to signal intensity and range.”

[Source / Images: From Improved Diagnostics to Presurgical Planning: High-Resolution Functionally Graded Multimaterial 3D Printing of Biomedical Tomographic Data Sets]

3D printing of scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-based data sets. (A) X-ray transmission image and (B) a corresponding backscattered SEM slice of a healing critical defect in an ovine femur immobilized with a titanium cage implant together with a higher magnification single slice backscattered electron micrograph. (C) A 3D-printed counterpart of the SEM image and (D) the corresponding higher magnification modulus map from the resulting 3D-printed model reveal the subtle differences in mineral density during the early stages of bone healing.

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, March 6, 2021: CGTrader, Lore, BAM

Creaform Launches Portable HandySCAN 3D | SILVER Series 3D Scanner



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Webinar and Virtual Event Roundup: February 28, 2021

We’ve got an interesting week of webinars ahead: three of the ones we’re telling you about in today’s roundup are on-demand, so you can watch them whenever you want! Additionally,...

3D Scanner Review: The Artec Eva and Artec Studio 15 Software

One of the first stories I ever wrote for 3DPrint.com was about a custom sleep mask for a patient with Graves’ disease, which often causes the eye to protrude and...

3D Printing News Briefs, February 4, 2021: BGU, KIT, Siemens, Moorebot, USA Luge & Creaform

In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ve got a couple of interesting research papers to tell you about, followed by a software release, a tiny autonomous robot, and how 3D...

3D Printing News Briefs, January 30, 2021: Azul 3D, TCT 3Sixty, 3DP4ME, DyeMansion, & cytena

We’re starting with a little business news in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, as Azul 3D welcomes a new member to its advisory board and yet another industry event has...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.