How Accurate are 3D Printed Dental Models?

Share this Article

3D printing and scanning technologies are digitizing dentistry. Instead of the old-fashioned way of taking impressions for things like braces and retainers, which would involve subjecting a patient to biting down on a mouthful of foul-tasting goo, more and more dentists and orthodontists are scanning their patients’ dental anatomy instead. Those scans are then used to 3D print dental models. This is not only easier on the patient, but it’s faster. While many dental offices are sending their digital files to laboratories to have them 3D printed, there is also a growing number of offices that have their own 3D printers, meaning that they can instantly print out the models while patients wait.

How accurate are these models, though? That’s the question that a group of University of Oklahoma researchers asks in a paper entitled “Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.

“A rapidly advancing digital technology in orthodontics is 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing, prompting a transition from a more traditional clinical workflow toward an almost exclusively digital format,” the researchers state. “There is limited literature on the accuracy of the 3D printed dental models. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of 2 types of 3D printing techniques.”

Those two types of 3D printing techniques were digital light processing (DLP) and PolyJet. For the study, the researchers took both digital and traditional alginate impressions from 30 patients. The digital impressions were used to 3D print models using both DLP and PolyJet printing techniques, and the alginate impressions were poured in stone. Measurements for the three model types (digital, DLP and Polyjet) were compared with the stone models.

Tooth measurements (first molar to first molar) included mesiodistal (crown width) and incisal/occlusal-gingival (crown height). Arch measurements included arch depth and intercanine and intermolar widths. Intraobserver reliability of the repeated measurement error was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

“The intraclass correlation coefficients were high for all recorded measurements, indicating that all measurements on all model types were highly reproducible,” the researchers state. “There were high degrees of agreement between all sets of models and all measurements, with the exception of the crown height measurements between the stone and DLP models, where the mean difference was statistically significant.”

The researchers conclude, therefore, that digital impressions and 3D printed models are perfectly viable for clinical applications. This isn’t a surprising conclusion; the accuracy and precision of scanning technology and 3D printing has been heralded by many. This study, however, gives scientific backing to the many claims that are out there. This should encourage many dental professionals that may be hesitant about turning to 3D printing to give the technology a chance; their patients will likely greatly appreciate it, and the results will be just as effective – if not more so – than the less-comfortable traditional techniques.

Authors of the paper include Gregory B. Brown, G. Fräns Currier, Onur Kadioglu and J. Peter Kierl.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

 

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing for Preppers: Investment Casting with PolyCast Filament

U.S. Energy Department Awards QuesTek $1.2M for Ultra-high Temperature 3D Printing Metals



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

NIST Awards $4M to Four Institutions for Metal 3D Printing Research

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory agency that promotes innovation and industrial competitiveness across the country, has awarded close to $4 million...

Xerox’s PARC to Use AlphaSTAR Simulation to 3D Print Turbomachinery Parts

California-based Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), a Xerox-owned research and development subsidiary company, has selected AlphaSTAR technology to create a virtual additive manufacturing (AM) approach that will save both time...

Air Force Awards Optomec $1M for High Volume 3D Printing Repair of Turbines

Optomec, a leading provider of additive manufacturing repair solutions, has won a $1 million contract from the U.S. Air Force to produce a system for the refurbishment of turbine engine...

3D Printed Turbine Combines 61 Parts into One

In July this year, Velo3D had qualified a new nickel-based alloy, Hastelloy X, due to its suitability in the additive manufacturing of power generation components such as gas turbines, using...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.