Irish Researchers Examine Benefits of Kinematic Error Modeling & Error Compensation in 3D Printing

Share this Article

While 3D printing has certainly hit the mainstream, industries of all sizes have been using the technology to their benefit due to greater affordability, self-sustainability in creating as the middleman can be eliminated, speed in turnaround for projects—and the ultimate, as objects and projects can now be created that were not thought (or even thought of!) possible previously.

Researchers like Shane Keaveney, Pat Connolly, and Eoin D. O’Cearbhaill—hailing from Dublin—are continuing to refine 3D printing, as outlined in a recently published paper, ‘Kinematic error modeling and error compensation of desktop 3D printer.’

The Irish research team focuses mainly on the benefits of CNC systems, along with using ISO standards for error assessment (namely, the ballbar method in ISO 230-4). In detailing basic error compensation models, the researchers hope to contribute to new standards for manufacturing, and more specifically medical devices. They used the Ultimaker Original for experimenting with kinematic error modeling and compensation due to its simplicity and affordability for users. For assessing errors both before and after compensation, the team used a Renishaw QC10 Ballbar in machine calibration.

“The experimental program set out to investigate the geometric errors of the Ultimaker Original 3D printer and the response of the system to compensation for detected errors modeled to include squareness, scale, and backlash,” stated the researchers.

Regarding further assessments for this project, the researchers state:

“Kinematic machine errors are errors concerned with the kinematic structure of the machine. This model represents the errors of the kinematic chains that provide a representation of the effects of the errors on a given print path. These errors, which include axis alignment, axis straightness, yaw, pitch, roll, offset of center of rotation, and offset errors, can be predicted or measured directly through machine error assessment methods such as the ballbar used in this study.”

The researchers also applied backlash compensation as designated by specific algorithms examining the tool path. Compensation can only be either ‘on’ (with an offset applied) or ‘off’ (also applied along the toolpath). Overall, the experiment was successful as the ballbar was extremely precise, requiring only one test. With application of relative error compensation, the researchers noted the ‘desired result,’ along with suggesting that this model and methods could be used in other systems with Cartesian linear axes configurations.

“The approach presented here allows for rigorous tuning in a systematic and thorough manner either periodically or during the initial machine manufacturing,” stated the researchers. “The ballbar method itself can be used for frequent checking of the 3D printer’s accuracy, precision, and consistency during the manufacturing process and the machine lifetime.”

In conclusion, the research team points out that greater standards are needed to encourage consistent quality in 3D printing—and especially for medical devices.

“Higher accuracies on these low-cost systems, as controlled and tested by standardized methods such as from ISO or ASTM, enables the impact and functionality of produced components to improve considerably,” concluded the researchers.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ScienceDirect]

Control ballbar result trace in CCW direction; (top right) control ballbar result trace in CW direction showing squareness error identification as no orientation change from CCW trace; (bottom) simulated pure backlash for demonstration of effect.

Comparison of uncompensated ballbar test trace (red) versus compensated ballbar test trace (green) showing the improvement in contouring and accuracy performance.

Share this Article


Recent News

Metal 3D Printing: Who Will Win the Laser Wars?

Ticket Prices for AMS 2021 Increase December 9



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3DQue Enables Automated, Wireless 3D Printing with New Pi Kit for Quinly

Canadian startup 3DQue always does what it can to achieve, and promote, mass production and cluster production through automated 3D printing solutions. Now, the Vancouver-based company has announced the release...

3D Printing Webinar and Virtual Event Roundup: November 29, 2020

While there are no more webinars for the month of November, we have plenty coming up this week when it switches to December. Topics including 3D software updates, cloud-based solutions,...

3D Printing News Briefs, November 28, 2020: Thinking Huts, nScrypt, Alloyed, ASTM International

We’re covering a variety of topics for you in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs. A nonprofit organization is developing a pilot project to build a 3D printed school, while nScrypt...

Playstation, 3D Printing, and the Future of Manufacturing

Filling an Industry 4.0 conference lineup is easy. Getting a lot of people excited about lights-out factories is also quite easy. It seems to be a simple way to get...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.