In a paper entitled “Approaches to open source 3-D printable probe positioners and micromanipulators for probe stations,” a group of researchers evaluate three types of open source probe positioning systems:
- mostly 3D printed
- partially printed using OpenBeam kinematic constraints
- a 3-level stack of low-cost commercial single axis micropositioners and some printed parts
All of the systems are easily customizable and can be fabricated with a RepRap 3D printer and off-the-shelf components. The first system can be purchased for $100 or fabricated for $5, the second can be fabricated for $25, and the third fabricated for $145. All three systems can utilize a customizable probe holder and tungsten carbide needle for $56.
“A microscopic probe positioner is used to make electrical contacts to test microelectronics under a microscope and demands a level of precision of movement that cannot be achieved by the unaided human hand,” the researchers explain. “Manually adjustable probe positioners are utilized in thousands of microelectronics labs while prototyping or manufacturing in small volumes. In addition to fully automated production wafer probers, manual systems are still used in parallel for process monitoring and debugging purposes.”
The first system can be 3D printed in under four hours using about 60 grams of filament, while the second can be fabricated in less than 30 minutes. The third system can be assembled in less than an hour after the necessary parts are 3D printed.
The paper contains a complete bill of materials for all three systems, as well as 3D printable files and full building instructions. All three systems are significantly less expensive than their commercial alternatives. Even the cost savings for the customizable probe holder can justify the cost of the micromanipulator-probe open source system, according to the researchers. Savings for the open source probe holder range from 80% to 90% compared to commercial probe holders.
All three micropositioners were tested in a dark cabinet with a commercial silicon wafer probe station. The wafer probe station floats on air cushions and is enclosed in a dark cabinet with a hinged access door. The micropositioners were tested for the maximum deflection that the probe head could experience.
“The results showed the maximum deﬂection for micropostioner design (a) was more than 200 μm, for (b) design 40 μm and for (c) design 10μm,” the researchers state. “These limitations were primarily caused by the designs not inherent limitations of print quality or resolution. It should be stressed that these are the worst deﬂections possible and that under normal operation the values are signiﬁcantly less. So for example, the 3-level stack design (c) micropositioners with careful operation result in a needle deviation less than 5 μm.”
All three systems can be improved in the future, the researchers continue, and they could potentially be used in clean room environments. The first system can be fabricated with higher performance polymers and redesigned to offer greater rigidity and smaller volume, and the second system can be redesigned to be smaller and lighter. The 3D printable parts for the third system can be redesigned to reduce mass, print time and cost and improve aesthetic appearance.
Authors of the paper include Iiro Hietanen, Ismo T.S. Heikkinen, Hele Savin and Joshua M. Pearce.
Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.
You May Also Like
4D Printing in China: Shape Memory Polymers and Continuous Carbon Fiber
Researchers have been looking further into the benefits of shape memory polymers (SMPs) with the addition of raw materials in the form of continuous carbon fiber (CCF). Authors Xinxin Shen,...
3D Printed Wireless Biosystems for Monitoring Cerebral Aneurysms in Real Time
Continuing to further the progress between 3D printing and electronics within the medical field, authors Robert Herbert, Saswat Mishra, Hyo-Ryoung Lim, Hyoungsuk Yoo, and Woon-Hong Yeo explore a new method...
Feasibility Models to Determine Efficacy of 3D Printing Over Traditional Methods
In ‘Model for Evaluating Additive Manufacturing Feasibility in End-Use Production,’ authors Matt Ahtiluoto, Asko Uolevi Ellman, and Eric Coatenea encourage the idea of exploring 3D printing for designs first, comparing...
Refining Macro and Microscopic Topology Optimization for AM Processes
Researchers from Italy and Germany continue along the path so many are following in refining and perfecting 3D printing processes. In the recently published ‘Structural multiscale topology optimization with stress...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.