3D printing with concrete is causing a shift in the construction industry, but as some experts have pointed out, we need to be careful not to get too caught up in the hype as opposed to the reality of the technology. One thing that many people forget is that 3D printed concrete still needs to be reinforced in some way, and no perfect solution has made itself available yet in terms of doing so. In a new paper entitled “Incorporating reinforcement into digital concrete construction,” which you can access here, a group of researchers discusses possible ways of reinforcing 3D printed concrete.
“Significant progress has been made in non-reinforced concrete printing in the recent years with research and industrial organizations producing geometrically complex structures as well as innovative rapid mass-customized buildings,” the researchers state. “However, the research on incorporating reinforcement into fully automated digital construction approaches is limited with the suggested solutions still being rudimentary…Since the use of reinforcement is mandatory in most structural applications, there is an urgent need to bring the technology of reinforcing 3d-printed structural elements forward.”
Several possible methods of reinforcement are discussed, including the placement of conventional, fiber or textile reinforcement with concrete deposition or between 3D printed concrete layers; enveloping concrete around steel reinforcement; using robotically produced reinforcement as a functional formwork in which concrete is placed subsequently; 3D printing with dispersed short fiber reinforced cement composites; and the advanced production of reinforcement and concrete robotically, “preferably in parallel.”
The researchers also discuss Mesh Mold technology, in which an industrial robot forms complex, free-form meshes that act both as formwork and reinforcement.
“Despite the encouraging concepts and prototypes, none of these approaches satisfies the entire spectrum of relevant requirements for wide ranging implementation of DC (digital construction), thus there should to be developed further,” the researchers continue. “The majority of the validated approaches are discontinuous, meaning concrete printing and reinforcement placement must be carried out one after other.”
This means that longer construction times and higher costs will likely be required, and/or additional equipment will be needed for placing reinforcement.
“The pre-stressing of post-placed reinforcement is only possible if continuous conduits are formed during 3dcocnrete-printing, effecting the geometrical flexibility,” they add. “Further, the weak layer-to-layer interfaces may also function as easy passages for transport of aggressive fluids and gases into printed structures. This is an important concern if steel reinforcement is to be used in digital construction and the risk of corrosion could be enhanced if thin free-form structures are to be printed.”
Other possibilities discussed include strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) and 3D printing of steel reinforcement using gas-metal arc welding (GMAW). Both are promising techniques that are currently being investigated.
In short, 3D printed construction isn’t as simple as it seems to be – you can’t just slap down layers of un-reinforced concrete and expect to create a safe building. Companies 3D printing buildings are coming up with creative ways to reinforce them, however, leading to safer, more permanent structures. The article argues that the methods being used for reinforcing 3D printed concrete are not perfect, but that with further development they could be made more effective.
Authors of the paper include Venkatesh N. Nerella, Hiroki Ogura, and Viktor Mechtcherine.
Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.
You May Also Like
NIST Awards $4M to Four Institutions for Metal 3D Printing Research
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory agency that promotes innovation and industrial competitiveness across the country, has awarded close to $4 million...
Xerox’s PARC to Use AlphaSTAR Simulation to 3D Print Turbomachinery Parts
California-based Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), a Xerox-owned research and development subsidiary company, has selected AlphaSTAR technology to create a virtual additive manufacturing (AM) approach that will save both time...
Air Force Awards Optomec $1M for High Volume 3D Printing Repair of Turbines
Optomec, a leading provider of additive manufacturing repair solutions, has won a $1 million contract from the U.S. Air Force to produce a system for the refurbishment of turbine engine...
3D Printed Turbine Combines 61 Parts into One
In July this year, Velo3D had qualified a new nickel-based alloy, Hastelloy X, due to its suitability in the additive manufacturing of power generation components such as gas turbines, using...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.