Study Finds that Orientation Influences Electrochemical Behavior in 3D Printed sensors

Share this Article

3D printing sensors is an area that is seeing a lot of emerging research. We all know that print orientation can really affect the quality of your prints. Sensors experience this as well with print orientation having been found to have effects on electrochemical behavior. The paper, entitled “The effects of printing on the electrochemical behaviour of 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiane styrine (ABS)/carbon black electrodes,” can be found here.

The researchers 3D printed a variety of electrodes using both horizontal and vertical printing direction. The horizontal printing direction resulted in a smooth surface for an HPSS (horizontally printed smooth surface)  electrode and a relatively rougher surface for an HPRS (horizontally printed rough surface) electrode. The vertically printed electrode showed enhanced current response when compared to the two horizontally printed electrodes, showing that print orientation is in fact a factor in the level of conductivity that a 3D printed object has.

“No differences in the capacitive response was observed, indicating that the conductive surface area of all types of electrodes were identical,” the researchers state. “The VP (vertically printed) electrode had reduced charge transfer resistance and uncompensated solution resistance when compared to the HPSS and HPRS electrodes.”

According to the paper, it’s a challenge to develop electrochemical sensors with complex geometry.

“Composite electrodes are defined as a surface that consists of an ordered arrangement (array) or a random arrangement (ensemble) of conductor regions, typically micrometres in dimension, separated from one another by an insulator,” the researchers explain. “Early composite electrodes were carbon paste electrodes, however over the years various conductive and insulative materials have been utilised.”

Composite electrodes are easy to make in any geometry using 3D printing, and have mechanically robust properies, but their performances vary depending on the differences in the homogeneity of the material and electrode surface from batch to batch. They also have increased resistance compared to solid conductive materials, presenting another challenge to the manufacture of composite electrodes.

3D printing has presented a viable way of fabricating complex electrodes, thanks to the availability of 3D printers and the variety of conductive filaments on the market. Several studies have used 3D printing for sensing, and carbon and metallic materials have been used for 3D printing the electrodes.

“A polystyrene 3D-Printed electrochemical device with embedded carbon nanofiber-graphite-polystyrene composite conductor electrode, showed to have good signal to background voltammetric responses for detection of aqueous Pb2+ via anodic stripping,” the researchers state. “3D printed metal electrodes have been shown to be suitable for the measurement of various analytes, where improved analytical performance and electrode stability compared to glassy carbon electrodes were shown.”

This study specifically was undertaken in order to explore the behavior for ABS/carbon objects that were 3D printed in a horizontal or vertical direction, and found that print orientation does in fact affect how conductive an object will be.

  “Overall, our findings indicate that 3D printed conductive materials can produce useful sensors for electroanalytical purposes, and that print orientation can significantly influence the electrochemical behaviour,” the researchers state. “Printing of conductive carbon composite filaments into 3D structures enhanced the electrochemical behaviour of the base material.”

Authors of the paper include Hairul Hisham Bin Hamzah, Oliver Keattch, Derek Covill and Bhavik Anil Patel.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

 

 

Facebook Comments

Share this Article


Recent News

Researchers Rely on 3D Printed Models & Surgical Guides for Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery

Sandia National Laboratories 3D Printing Tamper-Indicating Enclosures



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Featured

Digilab: On the State of Bioprinting Today

In a recent interview with Digilab‘s CEO Sidney Braginsky, Senior Applications Manager Igor Zlatkin, and John Moore, President and COO, 3DPrint.com got a glimpse of the focus, future, and advances...

Wikifactory’s Docubot Challenge Creates a Hardware Solution for Documentation

International startup Wikifactory, established in Hong Kong last June, is a social platform for collaborative product development. Co-founded by four makers, and until recently counting 3DPrint.com Editor-in-Chief Joris Peels as a member...

Kickstarter Campaign Continues for High-Resolution Jewelry 3D Scanner

Ukrainian company D3D-s was founded four years ago by father and son team Leonid and Denys Nazarenko, and last year they successfully raised $250,000 through Kickstarter for their first desktop 3D...

Interview with Formalloy’s Melanie Lang on Directed Energy Deposition

When I met Melanie Lang at RAPID a lot of the buzz on the show floor was directed at her startup Formalloy. Formalloy has developed a metal deposition head that...


Shop

View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.


Print Services

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our 3DPrint.com.

You have Successfully Subscribed!