I was never very good at chemistry experiments in school, and now that I’ve just heard the word mechanochemistry for the first time, I’m starting to get nervous all over again, as if I’m approaching a set of beakers back in high school. But if you break it down, the concept is pretty interesting – mechanochemistry is basically an interface between mechanical engineering and chemistry. It’s the combination of mechanical and chemical phenomena on a molecular scale, and includes molecular machines and shock wave chemistry. A team of researchers with the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) in Belgium is working on this interesting field of study, and using 3D printing technology to improve their experiment.
As mechanochemistry has spread across all areas of chemistry, it’s been able to synthesize multiple materials when what’s known as the typical ‘wet chemistry’ process isn’t working. But the downside is that the characterization of the reaction mixture is far less accessible than it is in solutions. Both X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy, a technique which typically provides an identification ‘fingerprint’ for molecules in chemistry, were recently used to achieve in situ observations of mechanochemical reactions.
It’s possible to track solid-state reactions during synthesis, including material transformations and phase transitions, in what’s called a ball milling jar. But, because of scattering from its walls, as the X-rays go through the jar, the diffraction patterns offer a high background. Additionally, it’s expected that the sample will present broad diffraction peaks, due to the probing of a large sample area that covers the whole jar, and an extra complexity shows up as a result of diffraction on the milling balls. This technique has gained popularity in many of the various fields of mechanochemistry, but isn’t foolproof.The researchers, with UCL’s Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanoscience, hypothesized that the issues with the diffraction could possibly be fixed, but not by changing the technique. The team decided to try modifying the material and geometry of the ball milling jar, and decided to use 3D printing technology to make the jar, as it has a complicated geometry that would be difficult to reproduce using conventional manufacturing techniques; this is especially true at the prototyping stage.
The research team recently published a paper on their efforts, titled “3D-printed jars for ball-milling experiments monitored in situ by X-ray powder diffraction,” in the Journal of Applied Crystallography; co-authors included UCL researchers Yaroslav Filinchuk; Nikolay Tumanov, also with the Department of Chemistry at Belgium’s University of Namur; Voraksmy Ban, also with the MS Group of the Swiss Light Source with the Paul Scherrer Institut in Switzerland; and Agnieszka Poulain, who is with the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in France.
According to the abstract, “Mechanochemistry is flourishing in materials science, but a characterization of the related processes is difficult to achieve. Recently, the use of plastic jars in shaker mills has enabled in situ X-ray powder diffraction studies at high-energy beamlines. This paper describes an easy way to design and manufacture these jars by three-dimensional (3D) printing. A modified wall thickness and the use of a thin-walled sampling groove and a two-chamber design, where the milling and diffraction take place in two communicating volumes, allow for a reduced background/absorption and higher angular resolution, with the prospect for use at lower-energy beamlines. 3D-printed polylactic acid jars show good mechanical strength and they are also more resistant to solvents than jars made of polymethyl methacrylate.”
In the paper, the research team details how 3D printing was used to quickly make the ball milling jars, and optimize them to achieve improved absorption and angular resolution, and a better, less high background, for their X-ray powder diffraction experiments. As we know, 3D printing technology allows for low-cost, on-demand production of customized objects, and the UCL team’s 3D printed jars were manufactured to be more resistant to solvents, when compared to typical acrylic jars. 3D printing has been used for experiments in the growing materials science field before, and judging by the success of the UCL researchers, I’m sure other institutes will also turn to the technology for help. Discuss in the Mechanochemistry forum at 3DPB.com.[Source: Science News]
You May Also Like
3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: October 24, 2021
It’s another busy week of events and roundups, covering topics from dispensing and medical applications to AM risk assessment, software, and much more. Read on for all the details! ViscoTec’s...
2021 Formnext Start-Up Challenge & AM Ventures Impact Award Winners Announced
While the physical event was canceled last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Formnext is back live and in-person this year, November16-19, albeit with some very specific rules for attendance....
Hexagon & Stratasys Announce Partnership to Integrate Digimat Software with ULTEM 9805
One of the world’s most prominent intelligent manufacturing software firms, Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, has announced a new partnership with Stratasys, an industry leader in producing 3D printers and solutions for...
RAPID + TCT 2021 Day 2: 3D Printing with Inkbit, Farsoon, AON3D, & Raise3D
At the recent RAPID + TCT 2021 in Chicago, I had the opportunity to attend keynote presentations, interview several industry companies, watch an awards ceremony, and walk the show floor....
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.