Selective Separation Sintering: NASA Challenge Leads to an Entirely New 3D Printing Technology for the Moon and Mars
While there are many reasons to push for the development of 3D printing technology in space, the biggest reason is that shipping things to outer space is expensive – really expensive. According to NASA, it costs about $10,000 to launch a mere kilogram of cargo into low Earth orbit, and $100,000 to send that same load to the moon. To ship cargo to Mars, the costs become astronomical (sorry). Most experts agree that the only way to feasibly meet the much-talked-about goals of setting up bases on the moon and exploring Mars is to develop technology that will allow us to 3D print whatever we need right there, using the resources at hand.
Figuring out how to do so is obviously a huge task, so NASA frequently reaches out to the larger community in the forms of competitions that challenge participants to come up with designs and technology that could feasibly be used in the exploration and colonization of the moon and Mars. Their most recent challenge, the In-Situ Materials Challenge, asked participants to come up with construction methods using native, or in-situ, surface materials to build structures on other planets, as well as on Earth. The winners were recently announced, and the top prize was taken by Dr. Behrokh Khoshnevis, engineer and professor at the University of Southern California, who developed no more than an entirely new 3D printing process.
It’s not the first time Dr. Khoshnevis has won a NASA challenge. In 2014 he was awarded first place in the Create the Future competition for his Contour Crafting technology, which utilizes gigantic 3D printers to build large-scale structures on Earth and, potentially, in space. For the In-Situ Materials Challenge, he built upon that technology to develop Selective Separation Sintering (SSS), a 3D printing process that he describes as “a novel powder-based additive manufacturing method that can build parts of various scale out of polymers, metals, ceramics and composites.”
Unlike Contour Crafting, which is an extrusion-based technology that uses a paste-like material to build large structures one layer at a time, SSS utilizes powder to construct smaller objects like bricks, interlocking tiles, and a wide range of functional metallic components. Dr. Khoshnevis and his team developed the method using a synthetic material designed by NASA’s Johnson Space Center to simulate the gravel and soil found on the moon and Mars. By combining that material with high melting point ceramics such as magnesium oxide – also found on the moon and Mars – the team was able to print tiles strong enough to withstand the heat and pressure of landing spacecraft.
According to Dr. Khoshnevis, the only way to further space exploration is to develop the capability of building roads, hangars, blast walls, radiation shields and landing pads on Mars and the moon, and the combination of his Contour Crafting and SSS technologies has the potential to fabricate both the large and small components needed to set up shop on another planet for an extended time.
“(SSS) could make space pioneering more cost-effective and feasible,” he said. “There are no viable, direct, high-temperature metal, ceramic or composite fabrication methods that can work in zero-gravity conditions. SSS will be the first such process…There is high potential for the space and planetary use of this technology. SSS is a minimally complex but highly capable technology that can effectively assist planetary exploration, utilization and colonization.”
The next step Dr. Khoshnevis and his team, who were awarded $10,000 for their work, plan to take is to test the process in vacuum chambers at the Kennedy Space Center and USC’s Astronautics Rocket Lab. Going forward, they hope to partner with aerospace companies in the Los Angeles area to further drive the project’s development. You can read a full study on Selective Separation Sintering here. Discuss further too in the New 3D Printing Method forum over at 3DPB.com.[Source/Images: NASA, USC]
You May Also Like
3 Key Indicators of Great Company Culture
Additive manufacturing is not immune to the thread that binds a team or company together. A thread better known as ‘company culture.’ Each business has one, each one is different....
Hyperganic Raises $7.8M in First Venture Round for AI-Driven 3D Printing
Embarking on a journey to recreate nature’s most complex designs through artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing, German company Hyperganic raised $7.8 million in its first venture round on February...
3D Printing Financials: Voxeljet Revenue up 80% since Last Earnings Report, Losses Deepen Year-over-Year
Industrial 3D printer manufacturer voxeljet (Nasdaq: VJET) reported fourth-quarter net losses for 2020 of €3.7 million ($4.3 million) after posting similar losses in the same period a year earlier. The...
3D Printing Financials: SLM Solutions Reports Losses of €30M for 2020, Revenues Up 26%
SLM Solutions (AM3D.DE) reported a €30 million ($35 million) loss for the year ending December 31, 2020, with revenues at €62 million ($73 million) versus €49 million ($58 million) in...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.