Optimization of materials. It’s may sound like a simple enough goal, but it is an ongoing and progressive challenge in many 3D printing research and development projects, with a wide range of different enhancements being possible today–especially with conductivity. Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are now also looking at using 3D printing to control materials that historically have presented difficulty in doing so.
In their paper, Controlling Material Reactivity Using Architecture-–by Kyle T. Sullivan, Cheng Zhu, Eric B. Duoss, Alexander E. Gash, David B. Kolesky, Joshua D. Kuntz, Jennifer A. Lewis, and Christopher M. Spadaccini–the researchers examine how material architecture can be used to control dynamic materials and especially those that are more unpredictable–namely, reactive (energetic) materials.
“Energy transport in RM involves convection of gases as well as advection of particles as gases and temperature rapidly evolve after ignition. To clarify, in this work when we use the term convection, we are referring to gas transport (convection includes both advection and diffusion by definition), and the term advection applies specifically to the transport of molten or solid particles,” state the researchers in their paper.
“Using RMAs, we hypothesize that both the convective and advective components of energy transport can be controlled by the architecture, so long as the architectural length scales are commensurate with the length scale over which these transport phenomena occur.”
3D printing comes into play as they use the technology to actually make the architectures and then apply it to a surface with sufficient depth. With the hope being to rein in some of the unpredictability while also harnessing the benefits of reactive materials, the RMAs were created through making 3D conductive electrodes. Then, with electrophoretic deposition (EPD), they were able to use thermite nanoparticles to coat the reactive micro-architectures.Through a 3D printing process called direct ink writing, researchers first constructed 3D conductive electrodes. Then, through another printing process called electrophoretic deposition (EPD), the team coated the surface of the conductive micro-architectures with a composite film of thermite nanoparticles. With 3D printing, again, control was key, as they were able to control the thermite particles, which are actually a very random mixture.
“3D printing has allowed us to make high-quality parts with the feature sizes commensurate with the length scales of dynamic phenomena,” said Kyle Sullivan, a staff scientist and the paper’s lead author. “It’s allowed us to make precision geometries, with careful control over several length scales. With this spatial control, we wanted to examine how, and to what extent, this translates into controlling dynamic behavior.”
“The big message here is we’re showing 3D printing can be used to change the dynamic behavior of materials,” Sullivan said. “It’s very promising moving forward.”
The team was able to work with a range of materials and platforms which allowed for the best release rates of energy from the thermite particles. They plan to continue their study with even more advanced and complex architectures like lattices–often created through 3D printing in the medical industry.
[Source: Phys Org]
“If you look at the history of energetic materials, the scary part is that the performance is slowly plateauing,” Sullivan said. “While it’s only a matter of time for new formulations to be developed, this technique gives us an additional knob of using material architecture to tailor, and improve, the energetic materials we already have.”
The ultimate hope is that in perfecting this process in manipulating reactive materials, components of superior strength and durability can eventually be produced in industries that make items such as airbags, ejector seats, and other items that require quick-release materials and mechanisms. Discuss this story in the 3D Printing to Control Reactive Matter forum on 3DPB.com.
You May Also Like
New Data Report: 3D Printing Revenues Reached $2.12B in Q3 2020, Says SmarTech Analysis
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the global economy took a steep nose dive in 2020. This included the 3D printing market during the first half of the year, but our...
Registration Rates for AMS 2021 3D Printing Summit Increase January 15th
It’s almost February, which means that this year’s Additive Manufacturing Strategies is almost here! The annual 3D printing business summit, co-hosted by 3DPrint.com and market research and consulting firm SmarTech...
Desktop Metal Co-founder to Speak at AMS 2021
With Additive Manufacturing Strategies 2021 just around the corner, co-hosts SmarTech Analysis and 3DPrint.com are able to begin sharing details about exhibitors and keynote speakers. We are pleased to announce that the Co-founder...
2021 Dental 3D Printing Revenues to Reach $3.1B, Says SmarTech Analysis
SmarTech Analysis has published its sixth edition of the Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry report and, noting the tumultuous experiences of 2020, projects a promising turnaround for the market in 2021....
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.