If you have been following the 3D printing space for the past several months, then you know that 3D Systems has been working on creating a new 3D printing system that they say is based on a “racetrack architecture”. It is an assembly line of sorts, and is said to be able to fabricate objects up to 50 times faster than other printers currently available today. Now a little over seven months since they revealed details of this potentially revolutionary 3D printing process, a dutch research center, called TNO, reveals that they too are working on similar technology.
Where the racetrack-like 3D printing system provides the most benefit over more conventional 3D printers, is in terms of speed. Because traditional 3D printing is based on a more “sequential” process, where single builds are fabricated using multiple steps, the process is extremely slow. Anyone who has been around 3D printing or themselves have 3D printed something realizes this.
“You can imagine, each process step is in fact waiting on the other process steps to finish,” explained Houben. “That is an enormous lack of time. All this time you’re not producing, you’re not building. This demonstration system, as we have it right now, is up to 10 times faster than comparable systems. Not by adding an enormous amount of print heads; it’s the same amount of print heads — state of the art, normal technology — but implemented in a more efficient manner.”
That more efficient manner is the racetrack architecture where the print heads are constantly printing onto a print bed, whether it be via selective laser sintering or other powder based 3D printing systems. This allows for the continuous movement of the build platforms — or possibly the print heads — while the print heads can also continuously extrude material or energy. Because the extruders do not have to stop and change direction like in a traditional 3D printer, rapid print speeds are made possible.
TNO uses the same print heads as other companies such as Stratasys, although they don’t purchase them directly from these companies. Instead they purchase them from the sources themselves. However, because the process is different, in that it is much faster and demands much more from each print head, modifications must be made on the part of TNO.
“When you’re suddenly using such a print head for 90% of the time instead of 10%, you’re processing an enormous amount of material and a lot of difficulties occur which need to be overcome,” said Houben.Powered by Aniwaa
TNO says the print speed is around two meters per second, and when using a “droplet demand system” can reach speeds of four meters per second. This requires not only modification of the print heads but of the entire printing systems as a whole.
Houben says that many different 3D printing technologies can work with this process. They include inkjet printing (successfully demonstrated already by TNO), as well as powder based printing with a powder bed, and laser sintering (also typically using a powder system). It doesn’t end here though, as Houben said that TNO is currently working on implementing powder and laser sintering methods together as part of one “racetrack” 3D printing system.
While this system seems eerily similar to what 3D Systems has been working on, I wonder if there will be any IP issues. We know from past examples that 3D Systems does not shy away from patent protection, so it should be interesting to see if TNO will have any legal issues with their technology. From an outsider’s point of view, it is really hard to determine.
TNO is currently looking for companies to collaborate with and hopefully bring this technology into real-world use. It should be interesting to see what the next couple of years have in store for the industry in terms of this large-scale additive manufacturing processes.
What do you think of TNO’s system? Does it seem too similar to the process that 3D Systems is using? Discuss in the TNO Racetrack 3D Printing system forum thread on 3DPB.com. Check out the Motley Fool interview with René Houben below.
You May Also Like
Cartilage Tissue Engineering via Characterization and Application of Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Based Bioink
International researchers continue the trend in exploring natural biomaterials for bioprinting, detailing their findings in the recently published ‘Characterization and Application of Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Based Bioink in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.’ Examining...
Review: Current Efforts in 3D Printed Pharmaceuticals and Drug-Delivery Systems
International researchers continue to explore the potential of patient-specific treatment via 3D printing, releasing their findings regarding pharmaceuticals in the recently published ‘3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals and Drug Delivery Devices.’...
Regemat3D Launches its New Bioreactors for Maturing Tissues
One of Spain’s leading biotech companies, Regemat3D, has been developing custom biofabrication systems and regenerative medicine solutions since 2011 to fulfill unique research requirements and offer customized solutions for patients’...
Louisiana Tech: 3D Printing Halloysite Nanotubes for Improved Methods in Bone Regeneration
Yangyang Luo recently submitted a dissertation, ‘Application of Halloysite Nanotubes in Bone Disease Remediation and Bone Regeneration’ to Louisiana Tech University. Focusing on what can be a very challenging field,...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.