Ursa Major’s New Process for 3D Printing Solid Rocket Motor Revealed by COO Nick Doucette

IMTS

Share this Article

Ursa Major, the Colorado-based manufacturer of rocket engines produced with additive manufacturing (AM), has unveiled Lynx, the company’s first design and production process for solid rocket motors (SRMs). Given that, in recent history, missile inventories have come to represent the primary application space for SRMs, Lynx is of the utmost relevance to the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) AM objectives.

Ursa Major has deep experience working with DoD, and, in 2023, won multiple contracts from the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) to build and test liquid propellant engines for the US hypersonic program. In August, the company also extended its partnership with Manufacturing Innovation Institute (MII) America Makes — originally begun in 2021 with the establishment of the Ursa Major Advanced Manufacturing Lab — through mid-2024.

Small, additively manufactured motor cases and components for tactical missile applications

Now, Ursa Major will bring the expertise and innovation it has spent years cultivating and demonstrating in the liquid engine space to the market for SRMs. The company’s chief operating officer (COO), Nick Doucette, who once ran AM operations for SpaceX, explained to 3DPrint.com the significance of this development for both rocket manufacturing as well as the AM sector. The key to understanding both is modularity.

“Every SRM size has different manufacturing challenges,” Doucette told me. “With the larger motors, the main challenges are tooling, getting consistency in the propellant itself, and how to structure the case to ensure its solidity. With the smaller ones, the challenge is more along the lines of how we move from our current process of making this part in twelve steps to just four. So, we’re starting with a smaller design because we can iterate faster. It’s no different from how we approach liquids. We built a small version of our liquid engine first and then tested it over and over again. Once we verified its effectiveness by using all of those lessons, we were able to scale up the process very quickly. That allows us to iterate, learn, and keep moving. From a capital perspective, it also gives a chance to squeeze more out of our capital expenditure, simply because we can do more with the smaller models.”

Smaller models could be especially important for SRMs, specifically, insofar as the missiles they’re most typically used in, such as Javelins and Stingers, are man-portable. This means that they’re designed to be carried by one person over long distances. Currently, one of the biggest obstacles for output of those weapons, which is causing ever-longer lead times for the US defense industrial base (DIB), is the fact that production lines for Stingers only make parts for Stingers, and those for Javelins only make parts for Javelins, etc. However, the modularity of Lynx, only possible thanks to AM, is meant to change precisely that.

“Let’s say we have two or three different man-portable SRM models that we’re making,” Doucette began. “From our perspective, a print’s a print. A print job could be made up of six small SRMs and three big ones, and then back to six small ones and, then, say, six big ones. If you can imagine a factory filled with printers that are making the motor cases, you could easily switch production lines over back and forth between different sizes. That’s one of the biggest challenges for the supply chain in its current form. One production line makes only this one motor, so if we need to increase surge capacity for that man-portable SRM, there’s no choice but to go to that one dedicated line. If you have a factory of printers working on multiple models simultaneously, though, it gives you more control to dictate the makeup of a production surge based on incoming demand. And it is truly ‘one-click,’ because it’s just a model change — it’s open this file, not that file, and that’s all there is to it. Maybe in reality it’s two or three clicks, but you get the idea.”

To be sure, Doucette is only able to make things sound this straightforward because he and everyone else at Ursa Major have spent around a decade conceptualizing, developing, and refining the underlying techniques involved. Nonetheless, the COO said that Ursa Major originally turned to AM for three fairly simple reasons:

“Ursa started out focused on liquid engines, an, from day one, we leaned heavily into additive. There were three theses behind that. The first was speed through development — obviously, manufacturing times can be greatly reduced with 3D printing. That doesn’t always mean it’s the most cost-effective method during the development phase, but it is certainly one of the fastest. The cost-effectiveness comes in afterwards with the second thesis, which is adding simplicity to the manufacturing process: combining parts, reducing the number of steps. On the liquid side, for instance, you can eliminate steps like welding and brazing if you use 3D printing strategically.

“Lastly, the third thesis is improved performance. There’s a weight savings, with a specific geometry that helps maximize and achieve different performance metrics, which you really wouldn’t be able to achieve without very customized additive processes. Our proof of the validity of those three theses has paid dividends over the last five or six years. As we looked at SRMs over the last couple of years, we recognized significant shortcomings in the speed for new product development. Thinking through how much additive helped solve some of the liquid issues and shrunk the development timelines and the manufacturing complexity, we saw the same issues with SRMs… We’ve been shocked about how well additive translates across applications. But essentially what we’re doing is trying to take advanced manufacturing methods, apply them to a very traditional manufacturing process, and doing so to make everything faster and cheaper, which are always common goals for most manufacturing companies.”

Ursa Major designed, developed, and tested a 6” diameter composite grain pathfinder motor in 37 days

The increasing ability of AM to successfully execute in new ways on those age-old objectives of all manufacturing operations has caused the DoD, among others, to start taking the technology very seriously in 2023. According to the new report from Additive Manufacturing Research, Additive Manufacturing for Military and Defense, the DoD will spend an estimated $300 million on 3D printers in 2023. Along these lines, it is becoming more and more evident to those at the intersection of defense and advanced manufacturing that a nation’s AM capabilities are rightly viewed as a form of deterrence: the more missiles the US proves it can make, the less leverage its strategic competitors have in flexing the same muscles.

At the same time, Doucette concluded the interview by pointing out that there’s still much work to be done, when it comes to raising awareness about the connection between manufacturing capacity and national security.

“I hate to draw parallels to the late thirties and early forties, because that was an environment that was radically different from the present. However, to be a global leader in defense and space, a nation needs a certain capacity to manufacture not just consumer goods, but defense hardware and other critical items — for instance, semiconductors. With the CHIPS Act, we saw recognition that, as a nation, we need to control certain aspects that comprise so many critical aspects of our everyday life. So, it may be defense, it may be consumer goods, but the more you depend on external sources, you become a bit exposed. And I think we’re seeing demand gaps grow more and more.

“That data is now becoming more and more relevant, because, unfortunately, there’s an increasing number of conflicts in the world. I hate to say that’s the reason, but it is. Ukraine first, then the conflict in the Middle East, not to mention any sort of simulated conflict in the South China Sea. We’re not measuring deficiencies in missile supply in days or weeks or even months — it’s years. You take SpaceX out of the equation and China outlaunches the US by a ratio of four to one. So we’re seeing that we a re falling behind on developing critical national capabilities. We’re starting to wake up to the fact that we have to be careful about maintaining the types of manufacturing capabilities the US really needs to continue its position as a world leader. And I think deterrence is one of the ten or fifteen things that’s on the list of reasons why we have to make sure we have stable domestic supply chains — from raw material to the final, integrated product.”

Images courtesy of Ursa Major

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, April 20, 2024: Manufacturing 4.0 Consortium, Blow Molding, & More

EOS & AMCM Join Forces with University of Wolverhampton to Establish UK Centre of Excellence for Additive Manufacturing



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Sponsored

Why Corrosive Resistant Materials Are Important to the Success of 3D Printing Across Industries

The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) is accelerating across many major industries. As this technological shift unfolds, the importance of corrosion resistance has emerged as a challenge for 3D printing...

America Makes Announces IMPACT 2.0: $6.6M in New 3D Printing Funding

America Makes, the Manufacturing Innovation Institute (MII) based in Youngstown, Ohio, has announced IMPACT (Improvement in Manufacturing Productivity via Additive Capabilities and Techno-Economic Analysis) 2.0, a project call which will...

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: April 14, 2024

We’re starting off the week’s 3D printing webinars and events at ASTM AMCOE’s 11th Snapshot Workshop and MACH Exhibition. Stratasys continues its advanced training courses, SME is holding a virtual...

AMUK Welcomes Airframe Designs as British 3D Printing Industry Grows

While the UK is not the hub for 3D printer and materials manufacturers as other nations, the country continues to excel at the research, development, and application of additive manufacturing...