3D Printing Aids and Replaces Soft Tooling

ST Dentistry

Share this Article

In pervious articles, we’ve discussed the benefits that 3D printing brings to tools for injection molding, die casting and forging. The technology also has its place in complementing or supplanting soft tooling, also referred to as rubber molding, silicone molding, room-temperature vulcanized (RTV) molding, or urethane casting.

Unlike hard tooling, made up of an aluminum or steel mold, soft tooling is comprised of silicone, urethane or other flexible materials and is used to produce parts with material properties that are more akin to a final injection molded material. This process is sometimes called RTV molding due to the fact that it can be performed at room temperature, unlike injection molding, which requires melting plastic pellets. Soft molds are usually manually injected with a given material through a gravity-fed tube.

Traditionally made soft tooling. Image courtesy of the Technology House.

Rubber molding is often used as a bridge between the prototyping phase and injection molded parts, providing material properties that are more akin to the final injection molded material but at a lower cost than hard tooling that will be used for end production. Moreover, it can be used to produce limited runs of final parts while hard tooling is being made. While soft tooling is typically more economical for smaller batch sizes, it can’t survive as many shots as a metal mold. Soft tooling may be utilized in any of the following circumstances:

  • Properties of the final production material must be evaluated
  • Quantity exceeds economical prototyping capacity
  • A trial batch is necessary before production
  • The design is not ready for production tooling
  • Only small production batches (tens to hundreds) of items are required

3D printing is already used today in the fabrication of soft tools. A prototype may be made with stereolithography, digital light processing or some other high-resolution 3D printing technology, like material jetting (e.g., PolyJet from Stratasys, MultiJet Printing from 3D Systems, etc.), before a flexible silicone mold is made around the prototype. The right urethane is then selected to be injected into the mold to create a part.

A 3D-printed mold used for urethane casting. Image courtesy of 3D Systems.

Kevin Klotz, Sr. Project Engineer MGS Mfg. Group, for instance, told 3D Hubs that MGS uses 3D printing to produce molds directly, saying, “Sometimes it’s not so much the cost of a 3D printed tool insert verses a soft tool version, it is that we can’t produce the detail in the soft tool without, for instance, applying Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) techniques. Somos PerFORM allows for the creation of detail that otherwise could not be made and to make it in less time.”

Recently, Israeli startup Nanofabrica has deployed its micro additive manufacturing technology to 3D print micro molds, dubbing the process “Direct Rapid Soft Tooling”. Nanofabrica’s Terra 250 AM system is an “ultra-high” resolution DLP machine that relies on semiconductor lithography to print layers as fine as 1 micron. The company, which recently raised $4 million in a financing round led by Microsoft’s M12 venture fund, was able to inject polypropylene, polyethylene and ABS into micro molds 3D printed with the Terra 250 AM system.

Molds lasted 20 shots at pressures of 400 bar at 230°C. Within the coming months, Nanofabrica is aiming to optimize the technology to create molds that can last 1,000 shots at temperatures of 350°C and pressures of 800 bar. So far, soft tooling that small was limited to research efforts, with a team from the Technical University of Denmark, printing micro mold inserts, as shown in the video below.

A Soft Tooling Process Chain for Injection Molding of a 3D Component with Micro Pillars 


At the macroscale, now that polymer 3D printers are beginning to achieve the throughput and material properties possible with silicone molding, they are able to compete directly. In particular, companies like Carbon are working to develop materials that most closely resemble material properties used in injection molding, while AddiFab and Collider have learned how to combine injection molding with 3D printing in unique ways that allow for the use of existing injection molding plastics.

Share this Article

Recent News

3DPOD Episode 153: 3D Printing Success with 3Doodler Inventor Max Bogue

AddUp Joins $1.5M USAF Contract to Boost Aerospace 3D Printing


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

3D Printing News Briefs, May 27, 2023: Contract, Acquisition, Movie Prop, & More

We’re discussing Sintratec’s All-Material Platform first in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, and then moving on to an NSF Career Award for a University of Pittsburgh research and a Phase...

Zeda Opens 3D Printing Facility in Cincinnati to Serve Regulated Industries

Today, California-based Zeda, Inc. announced that it has officially opened the doors to its new 75,000-square-foot advanced manufacturing facility in Cincinnati, Ohio. The company, which rebranded to Zeda from PrinterPrezz...

3D Printing News Briefs, May 13, 2023: RAPID Roundup Part 2

For the second time this week, 3D Printing News Briefs is focused on news stories about RAPID + TCT! From new hires and 3D printer integrations to new 3D printers,...

Dyndrite RAPID Roundup: Partnering with Impossible Objects, BCN3D, AMFG, & UPM

Like so many other 3D printing companies, Dyndrite attended the recent RAPID + TCT, North America’s premier annual additive manufacturing trade show. The Seattle-based AM software company, which developed its...