Nanyang Technological University: Experimenting with Acoustic Nozzles to Disrupt Clogging in 3D Printing

IMTS

Share this Article

Thesis student, Yannapol Sriphutkiat, of the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Nanyang Technological University recently published, ‘Development of acoustic nozzle for 3D printing,’ exploring the use of acoustic vibrations to solve one of the most common problems: clogging.

As with so many innovations and improvements allowed through 3D printing, it all makes perfect sense—using acoustics to manipulate microparticles and prevent clogging. For this study, Sriphutkiat researched the use of standing surface acoustic waves (SSAWs) in microchannels to reduce the issue.

Proper alignment of printing materials in the nozzle and elimination of clogging leads to a better outcome not only for 3D printing overall, but especially in bioprinting practices as it limits cell density in the material. While there are numerous challenges in bioprinting, clogging is one that still confounds and thwarts researchers:

“Suspensions are likely to sediment and aggregate in the cell reservoir, tube and nozzle of the printing system, the sedimentation reduces the width of the flow path which may also lead to clogging within the narrow geometry of the inkjet nozzle. The clogging could significantly increase the normal stress and shear stress applied to the cells, which may decrease the cell viability and proliferation rate, and decrease formation of nonuniform droplet sizes of bioink,” stated the researchers.

The schematic of clogging mechanism

Although clogging continues to be a mystery in many ways, in this study, researchers are optimistic about the use of vibration as a solution for both stability in production and reduction of clogging too. The overall idea of such a technique is to ‘disturb the clogging behavior,’ which often seems to occur around the entrance of the pore throats, and then completely blocking or bridging the area.

“SSAWs move microparticles away from the wall, towards the center of the microchannel, and therefore, reduce the chance of microparticle accumulation/clogging,” stated the researchers, who employed dual-frequency excitation for the SSAWs, for better control.

The acoustic nozzle caused cells to accumulate toward the center of a cylindrical tube in the lab, allowing for success in 3D printing, with tuning of SSAWs decreasing the width of accumulated microparticles.

Schematic diagram of SSAW consisting of (a) PDMS-LiNbO3 and (b) superstrateLiNbO3

“In comparison to the conventional printing strategy, acoustic excitation could significantly reduce the width of accumulated microparticles in the printed structure (p < 0.05). In addition, the microparticle motion excited at higher harmonics (385 kHz and 657 kHz) was also studied,” stated the researchers.

The study continued successfully with bioprinting as the researchers observed C2C12 cells being controlled by the acoustics. Once printed, they were studied for a week. The cells exposed to acoustic excitation accumulated near the center of the nozzle, while cells from the control group were scattered. Acoustically manipulated cells also showed more ‘significant dense cell structure,’ while the control group cells were still more chaotic.

“Overall, the acoustic approach is able to accumulate microparticles/cells in the printed construct at a low cost, simple configuration, and low power, but high biocompatibility,” concluded the researchers. “In the future, acoustic patterning of various biological cell types in printed construct could be investigated. As acoustic method has a capability to manipulate the microparticle/biological cells depending on their physical properties (compressibility, density and size).

Sound has played a role in numerous 3D printing techniques, from the development of acoustic metamaterials to implanting items with sound data, or even 3D printed symphonies. Find out more about how innovations such as acoustic nozzles can improve the 3D printing process here. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

Schematic diagram of experimental setup.

[Source / Images: Development of acoustic nozzle for 3D printing]

Share this Article


Recent News

Polls of the Week: Are 3D Printed Guns a Threat and Should We Regulate Them?

Deloitte Study: US Needs 3.8 Million Manufacturing Workers by 2033, and Half Those Jobs Could Remain Unfilled



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Researchers Gain New Levels of Control over Volumetric 3D Printing

A recent study published in Advanced Materials Technologies by Nathaniel Corrigan, Xichuan Li, Jin Zhang, and Cyrille Boyer delves into the advancements in xolography, a pioneering volumetric 3D printing method....

3D Printing News Briefs, April 3, 2024: Kickstarter FDM 3D Printer, Artificial Eyes, & More

In 3D Printing News Briefs today, we’re talking about an FDM 3D printer on Kickstarter, advancements in artificial eye creation, and 3D printed solenoids for electromagnets. Then we’ll move on...

Stanford Researchers 3D Print Elusive Shapeshifting Structures

Nano 3D printing is a field that continues to make steady progress, but whose applications are still being discovered. One of the most exciting areas where additive manufacturing (AM) at...

3D Printing News Briefs, March 16, 2024: Partnerships, Affordable Bioprinter, & More

We’re starting with dental 3D printing news today, and then moving on to some new partnerships. Then it’s on to some interesting university research about 3D printing plant-based pharmaceuticals, but...