To make this material, the researchers use a 3D printing method that employs photopolymerization, which solidifies a liquid resin into a desired geometry or shape using light. The researchers further explain their work in a paper, titled “Additive manufacturing of seal-healing elastomers,” which was recently published in the journal Nature.
The abstract reads, “Nature excels in both self-healing and 3D shaping; for example, self-healable human organs feature functional geometries and microstructures. However, tailoring man-made self-healing materials into complex structures faces substantial challenges. Here, we report a paradigm of photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing of self-healable elastomer structures with free-form architectures. The paradigm relies on a molecularly designed photoelastomer ink with both thiol and disulfide groups, where the former facilitates a thiol-ene photopolymerization during the additive manufacturing process and the latter enables a disulfide metathesis reaction during the self-healing process. We find that the competition between the thiol and disulfide groups governs the photocuring rate and self-healing efficiency of the photoelastomer. The self-healing behavior of the photoelastomer is understood with a theoretical model that agrees well with the experimental results. With projection microstereolithography systems, we demonstrate rapid additive manufacturing of single- and multimaterial self-healable structures for 3D soft actuators, multiphase composites, and architected electronics. Compatible with various photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing systems, the photoelastomer is expected to open promising avenues for fabricating structures where free-form architectures and efficient self-healing are both desirable.”
In making their material self-healing, the team had to do some in-depth research into its chemistry. You can achieve photopolymerization through a reaction with the thiols chemical group, which can transform into disulfides with the addition of an oxidizer. Objects made with this second group of chemicals are able to reform themselves if they break, so the researchers just needed to figure out the correct ratio.
USC Viterbi Assistant Professor Qiming Wang explained, “When we gradually increase the oxidant, the self-healing behavior becomes stronger, but the photopolymerization behavior becomes weaker. There is competition between these two behaviors. And eventually we found the ratio that can enable both high self-healing and relatively rapid photopolymerization.”
The team can 3D print a 17.5 mm square out of the material in just five seconds flat, and whole objects can be fabricated in about 20 minutes. For the purposes of their study, which was funded by both the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Young Investigator Program, the team tested out this capability on several products, including an electronic sensor, a soft robot, and a shoe pad.
Once these 3D printed items had been cut in half, they completely healed themselves two hours later at 60°C, with the exception of the electronics, which took four hours to heal because of the electricity-transmitting carbon. By increasing the temperature, the repairs will take place even faster, and the objects will still retain not only their function but also their strength.
“We actually show that under different temperatures – from 40 degrees Celsius to 60 degrees Celsius – the material can heal to almost 100 percent. By changing the temperature, we can manipulate the healing speed, even under room temperature the material can still self-heal,” said Kunhao Yu, USC Viterbi student and the first author of the study.
This self-healing material could help lower the manufacturing time, and increase durability and longevity, for many products in all sorts of industries.
The researchers are now focusing on making self-healing materials along a range of stiffnesses, from soft rubber to rigid plastics, which could one day be used to repair composite materials, body armor, and vehicle parts.
Co-authors of the paper are Yu, USC Viterbi students An Xin and Haixu Du, University of Connecticut Assistant Professor Ying Li, and Wang.
Discuss this research and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.[Source/Images: USC Viterbi]
You May Also Like
3D Printing News Briefs, September 19, 2020: Relativity Space, Farsoon Technologies, Johnson & Johnson
In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, the co-founder of Relativity Space is leaving his role of CTO, and Farsoon has delivered its largest order of plastic 3D printers. Finally, Johnson...
UpNano’s Nano 3D Printing Achieves Centimeter-Scale with High Resolution in Minutes
Vienna, Austria-based company UpNano, which is commercializing an ultrafast, nano and microscale 3D printing system called the NanoOne, has added even more laser power to its solution. Combine that with...
3D Printing and COVID-19: DreamLab Under Investigation Due to Customer Complaints
While many additive manufacturing operations may have appeared to be booming earlier in the spring, 2020 is turning out to be a bad year for DreamLab Industries. This is true...
Fundamental VR is Challenging Traditional Medical Training in the Age of COVID
Technologists and entrepreneurs Richard Vincent and Chris Scattergood were part of the mobile phone market for decades, creating innovative businesses with disruptive technologies. Then, in 2014, they decided to reimagine...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.