3D printing has, in the scope of a just a few years, moved from a technology on the periphery—primarily used by large companies for industrial manufacturing—to the mainstream—a technology on the minds, if not inside the homes, of consumers. The emergence of low-cost printers, accessible CAD software, and websites like Thingiverse and Shapeways mark an industry reaching a new stage of maturity. This unique moment, however, is not without its growing pains. As opportunities for companies and individuals to profit from 3D printing expand, claims of intellectual property theft are also on the rise.
In the past year alone, two cases of alleged theft have grabbed the headlines. In one, San Diego-based 3D printing company SD3D was accused of taking without permission a skateboard design placed on Thingiverse by the Italian designer Simone Fontana. In another case, the eBay seller just3dprint was embroiled in a public spat when it was accused of improperly downloading numerous designs from Thingiverse and then offering to sell products printed from those designs.
Two questions arise from these cases. First, is there anything improper about taking a design from a website like Thingiverse and selling products based upon those designs? Second, what can designers who put their designs online do to protect their intellectual property rights?
The answer to the first question is maybe. If a design is subject to copyright and has not been licensed by the designer, then a claim for copyright infringement may arise. Not all designs are subject to copyright protection. Copyright does not protect the purely utilitarian and so designs that are only functional in nature are not protected. (They may be eligible for patent protection but that requires applying to and receiving from Patent office a grant of patent rights.) Designs that are purely artistic or even contain artistic elements, however, are eligible for protection.
What can designers do to protect their intellectual property? First, in any public posting of their design, designers should make clear the terms upon which they are willing to license their work. Creative Commons licenses offer one easy means to do this. Second, designers must monitor how their designs are being used. Regular review of online marketplaces like eBay, Shapeways, Amazon, and Etsy is a must. Finally, if potentially infringing activity is detected, designers can either request the platform, such as eBay, remove the content or, if that does not work, pursue legal action.
Paven Malhotra is a partner at Keker, Van Nest & Peters in San Francisco, where his practice focuses on intellectual property disputes and complex commercial litigation matters.
You May Also Like
SmarTech Analysis Launches New Data Product Addressing Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing
Industry analyst firm SmarTech Analysis today announced a new data product geared towards addressing the critical metric of additively manufactured parts produced. The Additive Manufacturing Applications Market Analysis Report is a...
3DPOD Episode 14: Consumer and Affordable 3D Printers
This 3DPod Episode is filled with opinion. Here we look at our favorite affordable desktop 3D printers. We evaluate what we want to see in a printer and how far...
Hybrid Manufacturing: Opportunities for Additive Manufacturing and CNC Companies
“Hybrid Manufacturing Markets: Opportunities for Additive Manufacturing and CNC Companies”, a new report from SmarTech Analysis, digs down into the market for hybrid manufacturing systems, which combine AM with subtractive...
3DPOD Episode 13: Support Free Metal AM with Velo3D’s Zach Murphee
Velo3D was a mysterious stealth startup that unveiled a potentially breakthrough metal technology last year. Revealing more about its capabilities, partnering with service partners, and working towards printing aerospace parts...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.