Researchers Solve Major Issue Surrounding Metal 3D Printing With Reusable Substrates

Eplus 3D

Share this Article


Macro images of the interface between the substrate and 3D printed part

Not too long ago, metal 3D printing was rather rare. It wasn’t long though before all interested parties had their interests piqued, wondering about the possibilities. As the technology entered major industrial processes at great expense and initial experimentation, the world began to see it as an emerging and extremely viable and useful process.

With the world of 3D printing in metal comes power and strength both in materials and in resulting 3D products. While often all we need is a simple 3D print in ABS or PLA, for high quality and highly functioning components–like those often required in the automotive or aerospace industries–metal 3D printing is becoming invaluable and leading to numerous creations that simply could not have been fabricated previously.

All that power, strength, and benefit do of course come with some added work in post-processing. And while effort comes with gain, obviously, and we are all usually willing to put our best foot forward, eliminating time in post-processing of 3D prints would free up time better spent elsewhere.

Researchers from the Michigan Tech Open Sustainability Technology (MOST) Lab would like to see the time issues surrounding 3D metal printing and substrate removal resolved. It’s slightly more complicated than that, but in their recent paper, ‘In Situ Formation of Substrate Release Mechanisms for Gas Metal Arc Weld Metal 3-D Printing,’ researchers point out that making and employing a reusable substrate could be highly effective.

The authors, Amberlee S. Haselhuhn, Bas Wijnen, Gerald C. Anzalone, Paul G. Sanders, and Joshua M. Pearce, look specifically at the reuse of a substrate in gas metal arc weld metal 3D printing. The release mechanisms produced through the study are meant to be either highly affordable or completely free altogether in the process of gas metal arc welding (GMAW), which is already considered to be a more affordable form of 3D printing, in which a gas-shielded metal wire is “fed through a nozzle that is a consumable electrode heated by an electrical arc established between the wire and a metallic substrate.”

3-9a8b3d52f5Employing an open-source design for a 3D printer meant specifically for GMAW, a three-axis stage is featured upon which the substrate is clamped, while a welder is used for 3D printing layers in both aluminum and steel. While forming strong materials is desirable, having the 3D print strongly attached to the substrate is not. Thus, the research began to create a reusable substrate rather than the current model where strong adhesion led to constant breaking apart and sacrificing each substrate.

“As you know, metal 3D printing always demands post processing because at the very least you need to cut the metal part off of the metal substrate you printed it on,” Joshua M. Pearce, PhD, associate professor of both Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Michigan Tech, told 3DPrint.com. “We have solved the problem for aluminum and steel, using several techniques including variation in cover gas, surface pretreatment and selection of substrates to cause intermetallics–thus we can knock our prints off the substrate with a hammer and reuse the substrate.”

To begin, porosity, hardness traverses, and elastic and shear moduli were analyzed, and the following materials were chosen, along with intermetallics and oxides, for experimentation in substrate release for 3D printing with aluminum:

  • Aluminum oxide
  • Boron nitride
  • Titanium nitride

Through the manipulation of shielding gas, the researchers were able to figure out how to reduce and modify adhesion issues. In research, 3D prints were made with both aluminum and steel, employing both weld grade argon shield gas and RC25, a gas mixture of 25% CO2 as a ‘cover gas’ for 3D printing in steel.

A variety of substrates, with five samples per ‘treatment condition,’ were used in a range of materials for aluminum, coated and also then uncoated to serve as a control. The steel substrates were not coated at all. Standard aluminum and steel wire were used in the 3D printing process.


Alternating 3D printing paths improved quality

Alternating the print path in the metal 3D printing process improved print quality, with a 60-second pause in between each layer while printing with aluminum, and a similar but varied approach when 3D printing with steel, as so:

  • A ten-minute pause after the first layer
  • Sixty-second pauses after the 3rd and 5th layers
  • Two-minute pauses after every other layer

“All of the employed substrate release mechanisms minimized weld penetration, and, in some instances formed a brittle phase with the print substrate that allowed the specimens to be removed with minimal impact energy,” state the researchers in their paper.

Due to this process, plus allowing layers to cool and then quenching them with water, the researchers discovered substrates were easier to remove. Using digital calipers, the researchers measured each of the five samples that were produced for each group. Using a Charpy impact tester, they were able to remove each of the 3D prints from the substrate without breaking off any of the layers. No warping was produced in the prints, and the substrates were relatively unaffected by the process, with the underlying material remaining “clean and glossy.” Checking porosity afterward showed less than five percent porosity overall, with slightly less porosity in the steel substrate samples.

In allowing for the print settings to manipulate and encourage release of oxides, as well as encouraging aluminum-iron compounds to form, aluminum specimens were released more easily from the steel substrates–and without cutting tools. It was found that the aluminum oxide, boron nitride, and titanium nitride were effective as release agents as long as a binder was present.

Overall, these findings can be helpful to those who 3D print with metal on all levels, from small businesses to large industrial entities. Not only is the whole production process easier, the reusable substrates help save on the bottom line and are of course, also, much better for the environment.

Discuss these new research findings in the GMAW Metal 3D Printing forum thread over at 3DPB.com.

10-fb898f4552 (1)

Aluminum (l) and steel (r) substrates


Share this Article

Recent News

Former Xerox CTO to Drive Growth for Impossible Objects’ Composite 3D Printing

Gridfinity Could Bring 3D Printing Into Any Home and Many Businesses


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

Projects and Having Purpose

I am here to explain the mindset of creating things on a consistent basis and how creativity can be forced.. painfully and purposefully :).

3D Printing News Briefs: May 3, 2019

We’re talking with you about all things new in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs – a new partnership, a new material, and a new design challenge. DWS has announced that...

Cagey, Lovely & Strong! Amsterdam Designer Perfects New Es-Cage Method in 3D Printing, Offers Tutorials

Erik Es of Amsterdam is really onto something. In a world that’s growing ever more full of knickknacks and tchotchkes thanks to a multitude of different manufacturing processes and crafts—as...