White House Awards $2.8B to 3D Printing & Advanced Manufacturing EV Battery Projects

IMTS

Share this Article

In the Biden administration’s latest show of support for additive manufacturing (AM) and advanced manufacturing, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced the first round of grants for domestic manufacturing of electric vehicle (EV) batteries from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Awarded to 20 companies and totaling $2.8 billion, the funds will go towards mining, manufacturing, and recycling projects that are worth over $9 billion, and span six different segments of the EV battery supply chain.

In a DOE statement about the funding for domestic EV battery production, the US Secretary of Energy, Jennifer M. Granholm, commented, “This is truly a remarkable time for manufacturing in America, as President Biden’s Agenda and historic investments supercharge the private sector to ensure our clean energy future is American-made. Producing advanced batteries and components here at home will accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels to meet the strong demand for electric vehicles, creating more good-paying jobs across the country.”

3D printed lithium-ion battery, made by German company Blackstone Resources, which has been spun-off into Blackstone Technologies Holding. Image courtesy of Blackstone

The purpose of the project is essentially summarized in this key point from the press statement: “Currently, virtually all lithium, graphite, battery-grade nickel, electrolyte salt, electrode binder, and iron phosphate cathode material are produced abroad, and China controls the supply chains for many of these key inputs.”

Image courtesy of DOE

As was pointed out by — somewhat surprisingly — Senator Lindsey Graham, the US will never be able to rely entirely on domestic battery production. That was at another EV-related event marking BMW’s $1.7 billion investment in South Carolina (making it less surprising that Lindsey Graham would speak supportively of renewable energy). That investment is both the largest single investment in BMW’s history, as well as the largest single capital investment in the history of South Carolina.

Graham also referred to batteries as “the new oil”, and vowed that South Carolina would “become the Detroit of batteries”. Finally, amid promising to have an EV battery hearing if the GOP wins control of the Senate next month, Graham suggested that the US should “sit down” with Chinese battery manufacturers to revise the Biden administration’s $7,500 EV tax credit, to make it a “win-win” for the industries of both China and the US.

According to another Reuters article about the same event, BMW representatives mentioned that Automotive Energy Supply Corporation (AESC), a division of Chinese renewable energy company Envision, would also be building an EV battery plant in South Carolina. And, BMW Group Chairman Oliver Zipse told Reuters that the US should revise the EV tax credit to make it “not completely unrealistic”. Currently, the tax credit will disallow batteries with Chinese components after 2023.

Therefore, despite the seemingly zero-tolerance policy on China, that tough line is likely just a starting point for negotiations, and a US-Germany-China EV battery supply chain sounds like it has potential. At the same time, spreading investment across multiple parts of the supply chain, to companies all over the country, serves as an insurance policy for the American auto industry. And the quantity of materials involved is substantial. For instance, the quickly-rising AM materials company 6K Inc., backed by the Kochs, received one of the smallest grants at $50 million in this round of funding, and its project still entails developing the capacity to produce 10,000 tons per year of NMC811 and lithium iron phosphate metal powders by 2026.

With $4.2 billion remaining to be spent just on further funding rounds for this same market, it’s becoming less difficult to envision how the scale-up of US advanced manufacturing can happen as quickly as it needs to. Of course, all decision-makers involved likely do need to be willing to be less unrealistic, in general, for that to happen.

Share this Article


Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, April 20, 2024: Manufacturing 4.0 Consortium, Blow Molding, & More

EOS & AMCM Join Forces with University of Wolverhampton to Establish UK Centre of Excellence for Additive Manufacturing



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

Sponsored

Why Corrosive Resistant Materials Are Important to the Success of 3D Printing Across Industries

The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) is accelerating across many major industries. As this technological shift unfolds, the importance of corrosion resistance has emerged as a challenge for 3D printing...

America Makes Announces IMPACT 2.0: $6.6M in New 3D Printing Funding

America Makes, the Manufacturing Innovation Institute (MII) based in Youngstown, Ohio, has announced IMPACT (Improvement in Manufacturing Productivity via Additive Capabilities and Techno-Economic Analysis) 2.0, a project call which will...

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: April 14, 2024

We’re starting off the week’s 3D printing webinars and events at ASTM AMCOE’s 11th Snapshot Workshop and MACH Exhibition. Stratasys continues its advanced training courses, SME is holding a virtual...

AMUK Welcomes Airframe Designs as British 3D Printing Industry Grows

While the UK is not the hub for 3D printer and materials manufacturers as other nations, the country continues to excel at the research, development, and application of additive manufacturing...