3D Printing Scaffolds for Regeneration of Tissue After Mastectomies & Tissue Damage


Share this Article

Researchers from Belgium and Germany explore topics in bioprinting, evaluating biocompatible structures in the recently published ‘Evaluation of 3D Printed Gelatin-Based Scaffolds with Varying Pore Size for MSC-Based Adipose Tissue Engineering.’ Focused on finding further progressive solutions for patients who have gone through mastectomies or other types of trauma involving soft tissue, the research team 3D printed and evaluated gelatin-based scaffold samples.

Because breast cancer is, unfortunately, both so common—and potentially devastating—to women around the globe, continued research is being performed regarding diagnosis, treatment, and procedures for the regeneration of soft tissue. Many of today’s methods, however, present obstacles—from microsurgical complications to high resorption rates. With the advent of adipose tissue engineering, there is the potential for regeneration through the integration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and biomaterials.

In this study, photo-cross-linkable methacrylated gelatin (Gel-MA) is the material of choice, due to advantages such as its ability to interact with cells and similarities to collagen found in the extracellular matrix. The authors examine adipogenic differentiation behavior of bone-marrow-derived MSCs within 3D scaffolds that are porous. Rather than ‘confining’ cells, they allow three key activities: spatial spreading, movement, and distribution. With 3D printed samples, the research team was able to control parameters and make easy changes to 3D files and the resulting 3D prints.

Using an extrusion-based form of 3D printing, the team varied the sample scaffolds with strut spacing from 400 to 800 µm. This resulted in corresponding pore sizes of 230 ± 24 µm (400), 302 ± 30 µm (500), 348 ± 28 µm (600), and 531 ± 33 µm (800).

Physico-chemical characterization of the 3D printed Gel-MA scaffolds. a,b) Representative images of the pores together with the pore sizes obtained for the different scaffolds. The scale bars represent 200 µm. c,d) Stress versus strain curves obtained via compression tests from which the compressive modulus is determined. e) Mass swelling ratio of the scaffolds.

Control was maintained over high-shape fidelity scaffolds during printing by maintaining:

  • Constant pressure (120 kPa)
  • Temperature (30 °C)
  • Writing speed (10 mm s−1)

The researchers also maintained consistency in UV exposure time and employed a high-precision nozzle (150 µm) to create stable scaffolds—all displaying similar strut widths. While all samples could absorb water, this ability was increased in those with larger pores. Overall, the team noted a connection between both swelling and mechanical properties of the sample scaffolds, due to the mass swelling ratio, which was increasing, and the compressive modulus which was decreasing.

Adipogenic differentiation of MSCs on extrusion-printed scaffolds. a) Gene expression of the adipogenic markers PPAR-γ, LPL, FABP, and FASN by MSCs on TCP compared to the scaffolds. b) Brightfield and c) immunofluorescent images showing clearly visible lipid droplets after 8 days of culture in adipogenic media. d) Quantification of adipogenic differentiation by normalizing Nile Red (stains lipid droplets) area to the number of nuclei. The scale bars represent 200 µm in all images except TCP panel in (c) where it is 100 µm.

 “Although the stiffness of the extruded Gel-MA across all groups is 3–4 kPa mimicking native soft tissue compliance, the change in compressive moduli as pore size increases reflects the macroscale structural integrity of the scaffolds,” concluded the researchers. “In future work, maintaining low stiffness to promote adipogenic differentiation while improving the structural stability to improve implantation handleability could involve reinforcing the ink with secondary particles or phases.

“We found that MSCs differentiated robustly into the adipogenic lineage equally well in scaffolds of all pore sizes (200–600 µm). However, spatial distribution and cellular infiltration varied such that scaffolds with bigger pore sizes (>500 µm) support simultaneous differentiation and infiltration. These findings show the crucial importance of considering design parameters such as pore size when designing scaffolds for 3D soft tissue regeneration.”

Spatial distribution of cells and lipid droplets in scaffolds. a) Representative scaffold cross sections stained with DAPI (nuclei) and Nile Red (lipid droplets) on each scaffold type showing differences in cell infiltration and spatial distribution of adipogenically differentiated cells. Quantification of b) cell and c) Nile Red positive area in different regions of the scaffold.

The study of bioprinting and scaffolding continues to expand, and while such research for diseases like breast cancer is critical, other scientists have published studies regarding uses for seeding dermal fibroblasts, promoting cartilage growth, 3D printing for bone replacement, and a variety of other ongoing projects within this very important field. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Evaluation of 3D Printed Gelatin-Based Scaffolds with Varying Pore Size for MSC-Based Adipose Tissue Engineering’]

Share this Article

Recent News

3D Printing News Briefs, March 2, 2024: 3D Printed Firearms, FDA Clearance, & More

3D Printing Financials: Materialise Reports Growth in 2023 with Medical Segment Success


3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns

You May Also Like

3D Printing Financials: Xometry’s Year of Growth and Challenges

Finishing 2023 amid broader economic challenges that have troubled many in the 3D printing sector, Xometry (Nasdaq: XMTR) reported a solid 31% increase in the fourth quarter revenue, reaching $128...

3D Printing Financials: 3D Systems Misses Revenues by 9.32%, Targets 2027 for Clinical Human Lung Trials

In the latest financial unveiling, 3D Systems (NYSE: DDD) shared its fiscal report for the last quarter of 2023 and the entire year, shedding light on its struggles and strategic...

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: February 25, 2024

It’s another busy week of webinars and events in the AM industry, including Silicone Expo Europe in Amsterdam, an open house for Massivit in North America, and the AM for...

Materialise Expands Jaw Surgeries with End-to-End Medical 3D Printing Treatment

Imagine the discomfort of experiencing pain every time you eat, or the constant radiating pain in your head due to this condition—it would be incredibly distressing. One reason why joint...