AMS 2026

Singapore: Effects of Porosity on Mechanical Properties in FDM 3D Printing

RAPID

Share this Article

Authors Xue Wang, Liping Zhao, Jerry Ying His Fuh, and Heow Pueh Lee lead a complex discussion about porosity in 3D printing in their recently published article, ‘Effect of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymers: Experiments and Micromechanical Modeling Based on X-ray Computed Tomography Analysis.’

With a focus on FDM 3D printing and the defects it can cause due to voids and pores create in 3D printed thermoplastics, the authors investigate and experiment to understand the true impacts on mechanical properties. They also propose a micromechanical model to predict elastic qualities. In explaining the process of FDM 3D printing, the authors state the following:

“The fabrication process itself is a thermal one introducing heterogeneities in micro/meso length scale, especially voids and pores, of which the size, shape, and spatial distribution are highly dependent on the process parameters. Such voids and pores may affect the internal structure of the deposited materials and, in turn, affect the mechanical properties of the final product.”

While there are already many different research studies in existence regarding porosity, the researchers here are specifically interested in how the mechanical properties are diminished. Tests are performed, using a non-destructive method, with X-ray computed tomography (XCT), using a chromatic X-ray cone to show 3D features and characterize the following:

  • Size
  • Density
  • Shape
  • Spatial location of pores

Schematic illustration of a cone-beam X-ray computed tomography (XCT) system.

Three samples were created for testing:

“To utilize the DIC technique, high contrast speckle patterns in black and white were applied to the specimens before the tensile tests. Each specimen was then clamped at the two ends in the universal testing machine by two pairs of hydraulically controlled jaws, which were separated at a speed of 2 mm/min until the specimen fractured. During the whole test process, the specimen images were captured at a rate of 10 Hz by high resolution DIC cameras, and simultaneously, the load data used for calculating the stress (that is, tensile load divided by the cross-sectional area of the specimen) were recorded by the testing machine at the same rate,” explained the researchers.

In terms of pore size, the researchers found that most of the pores were below 0.2 mm, making up 99 percent of the pores and indicating that PLA may cause a ‘major population’ of small pores. In each sample, the pores covered nearly the whole specimen.

The PLA also demonstrated anisotropic behaviors as the researchers investigated tensile properties. This was expected, as was the fact that samples printed with a 0.48 mm extrusion width exhibited better mechanical properties.

“The actual pore size distributions were used to generate the RVEs and in turn to predict the macroscopic elastic properties. The prediction results for the elastic properties showed good agreement with the corresponding experimental data where the percentage difference was not larger than 7.9%. The predicted elastic properties also agreed well with two existing numerical works. The proposed micromechanical model has demonstrated itself as a potential tool for predicting elastic properties for the future designer. This provides a possibility of saving the material from undergoing destructive testing,” concluded the researchers.

Porosity is an ongoing topic among 3D printing users on nearly every level, from examining porosity in titanium to improving sealing qualities and also examining lattice structures. Find out more about experiments on 3D printed polymers regarding porosity here. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

Pore distribution for UPL = 1 mm characterized by X-ray computed tomography (XCT) of three-dimensional visualization in (a) and two-dimensional visualization in (b) the transverse plane, (c) the sagittal plane, and (d) the coronal plane. The red slim rectangular in (b) and (c) mark the selected pores of large size between two adjacent layers of the specimen. The distance between the l inearly aligne d large pores in (b) and (c) was measured as 0.4 mm, which is twice of the layer thickness of 0.2 mm.

[Source / Images: ‘Effect of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymers: Experiments and Micromechanical Modeling Based on X-ray Computed Tomography Analysis’]


Share this Article


Recent News

How Kupros, Inc. Plans to Smash the Barriers to Entry for Additive Electronics

Bambu Lab Starts Lets Make it Fund



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

The Deskside Manufacturing Evolution

When the desktop 3D printing revolution reared its beautiful head in the 2010’s the world was still suffering from a housing boom hangover. Technoptimism seemed to be the path ahead...

Is 2.20mm Filaflex a Goldilocks Solution for Flexible Filament?

TPU and other elastomeric materials have traditionally been tricky and difficult to print. Elastomers are generally difficult in additive manufacturing (AM). In the case of material extrusion, the use of...

Italy PM Meloni’s Bahrain Visit Spotlights ASRY and Roboze’s New 3D Printing Alliance

Bahrain is boosting its high-tech manufacturing, with Italy playing a key role. Arab Shipbuilding and Repair Yard (ASRY) and Italian 3D printing company Roboze signed a major partnership to build...

Applied Acoustics Uses Additive for Subsea Gear

Subsea equipment has to be rugged, temperature-resistant, and able to cope with the long-term effects of saltwater. Extreme pressure and pressure changes are also problems endemic to this industry. Subsea...