Westinghouse is looking to lower the cost of replacement parts as well as to speed the qualification of 3D printed materials. The company has been using additive manufacturing for casting molds to produce large replacement brackets and bearing housings for electric motors, and now it plans to use the technology to directly manufacture parts, or at least one part to begin with. By fall of 2018, Westinghouse plans to install a thimble plugging device made of 3D printed 316L stainless steel as well as non-3D printed 304 stainless steel, as Nuclear Energy Insider reports.
Over the course of the next year, Westinghouse is planning to explore how to reduce costs and lead times for obsolete and difficult-to-source parts, along with fuel structural components and prototypes for next-generation plants, such as impellers and microchannel heat exchangers. Additive manufacturing is a high priority for the company, which also plans to use the technology for other uses such as robotics, sensors, models for manufacturability and tooling.
In 2016, the US Department of Energy granted Westinghouse $8 million for multiple R&D projects focused on the advancement of new technologies, including a project working on qualifying powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes for nuclear components. In July of this year, the DoE granted the company an additional $830,000 in federal funding to study the neutron radiation effects on zirconium alloys produced through additive manufacturing for light water reactors. The researchers will conduct post-irradiation examination of zirconium material that was irradiated at the MIT reactor.
Westinghouse is currently looking at three primary 3D printing technologies. Laser powder bed fusion is good for the production of small, complex fuel structural components, prototype components and tooling. Directed energy distribution can be used to add features such as nozzles, bosses or flanges to existing components, and can reduce cost and lead time when used for weld repair or automatic cladding, as well as to produce larger or more complex components. Binder jetting can produce smaller, complex components for a lower cost than powder bed fusion. Westinghouse is also investigating friction stir, ultrasonic and metal spray processes.
In January of this year, Westinghouse estimated that additive manufacturing could cut the manufacturing cost of replacement parts by half.
The company has already cut costs by using 3D printing for tooling – in one case, the Westinghouse Specialty Metals Plant combined five parts into one part, using a metal that improved wear resistance and increased tooling lifespans.
“These cost and lead time reduction estimates still look appropriate for certain replacement castings, using current cost estimates for AM casting moulds and the associated foundries/casting processes,” said Clint Armstrong, Advanced Manufacturing Expert at Westinghouse.
One of the main goals now is to expand the framework of accepted standards as well as the pool of material performance data, including irradiation performance data.
“The main challenge in qualifying AM materials is the variability of material properties and overall part quality based on the feedstock material, AM process parameters and part geometry,” Armstrong said. “To combat this, most users are printing multiple parts for destructive testing, as well as multiple test specimens with production parts.”
This, unfortunately, can increase the cost of getting a 3D printed part to commercial production. Westinghouse is now collaborating with several other organizations on a DoE-funded project aimed at, according to Armstrong, developing an “in-process monitoring and integrated computational materials engineering process” to reduce the qualification process for additive manufacturing.
In addition, Westinghouse has participated on several ASTM F42 subcommittees on additive manufacturing, and is part of multiple America Makes & American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Additive Manufacturing Standardization Collaborative (AMSC) working groups. Recently, officials from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) met with proponents of additive manufacturing in nuclear power, and a two-day workshop in Washington, D.C. is planned for the end of the month.
“There are multiple people working on this in the nuclear industry, so there is momentum…We are all working together,” said Armstrong. “Getting all codes and standards in place is a lot of work.”
Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.[Source: Nuclear Energy Insider]
You May Also Like
Roboze’s Exclusive Subscription Plan to Print Parts Near Point of Production
COVID-19 unveiled production gaps in the current global supply chain as parts are produced in central location and shipped all over the world: that’s why the Roboze vision is to...
3D Printing News Briefs: December 20, 2020: iFactory3D, Farsoon, DMC & Produmax, EOS
In 3D Printing News Briefs this weekend, we’re talking about a successful 3D printer Kickstarter campaign, a high-temperature material, a partnership, and a new podcast. The Factory One 3D printer...
GoEngineer Now Largest U.S. Distributor of VELO3D’s Metal 3D Printing Solutions
After a few years of working in secret, privately funded metal 3D printing startup VELO3D came on to the scene with a bang with the introduction of its innovative, patented...
Farsoon Launches Flame-Retardant Material and Post-Processing Solutions at Formnext
Farsoon Europe and Tiger Coatings have successfully developed a specialized thermoset material, with flame-retardant properties, for polymer laser sintering using Farsoon’s HT252P industrial 3D printing system. The material, TIGITAL 3D-Set...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.