Cushioning or padding are utilized to dampen shock and vibrations, distribute and relieve stress, maintain relative positioning, or mitigate the effect of size variation. The materials that serve these purposes are part of our ever day lives in sporting and other consumer goods, as well as being utilized by the defense and aerospace industries and for packaging and transportation. Their ubiquitous nature has led to a thorough study of their uses, characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses.
This cushioning and padding can be provided through either gels or foams but either method has its disadvantages. Gels provide a high level of cushioning but are subject to lower performance depending on the temperature, and they are relatively heavy. In contrast, foams are lighter and have a high level of compressibility but their performance varies unpredictably as it is not possible to entirely control the shape, size, or placement of the air pockets they contain.
These new materials are produced using an additive manufacturing techniques called direct ink writing with a silicone-based ink that cures into a material much like rubber. Using this technique, engineers at LLNL are able to create materials with controlled, complex architectures called cellular elastomers. These ordered, cellular materials enable improved control over the material’s mechanical and directional properties, enhanced uniformity, and increased predictive modeling capability.
The team has released their research in the Journal of Advanced Functional Materials. Lead author Eric Duoss described the nature of their contribution:
“The ability to dial in a predetermined set of behaviors across a material at this resolution is unique, and it offers industry a level of customization that has not been seen before.”
The cushion material that the LLNL researchers created can have one of two different forms, a stacked inline configuration or a staggered configuration. The component materials for either configuration are exactly the same and posess the same degree of porosity but they exhibit very different responses to shear and compression stresses. The stacked configuration undergoes a buckling instability under increased compression, but at normal compression exhibits a stiffer structure while the staggered material is softer under normal compression with a bending deformation under increased compression.