Eagles have especially deep foveae, giving them their famously sharp vision, and a group of scientists at the University of Stuttgart have managed to replicate that eagle-eye vision using a 3D printer to print four tiny plastic lenses of varying focal lengths directly onto a single image-sensing microchip. The lenses with longer focal lengths capture high detail over a narrow field of view, while the lenses with shorter focal lengths capture lower detail over a wider field of view.
Dr. Harald Giessen, a physics professor at the University of Stuttgart, used software to compile all of the image data captured from the four lenses into a single circular image that mimics the vision of a human – or eagle – eye: it’s sharply detailed in the center, but gradually loses focus towards the edges. The entire four-lens camera measures less than 300 micrometers squared – about the width of three human hairs – and Dr. Giessen says that the creation of such a small device would have been impossible without 3D printing.
“There is no chance you can manufacture imaging systems of this quality by any other means,” he says.
Dr. Giessen and his team have documented their work in a newly released study entitled “3D-printed eagle eye: Compound microlens system for foveated imaging.” A micro-camera like the one they designed could be used for a tiny drone, barely visible to the human eye, to carry out surveillance over wide ranges while focusing on particular areas of interest, or for numerous other purposes including sensors on driverless cars or even devices that could look inside the human body.
“Our work demonstrates for the first time direct 3D printing of varying complex multicomponent imaging systems onto a chip to form a multiaperture camera,” the research team explains. “We combine four different air-spaced doublet lenses to obtain a foveated imaging system with an FOV of 70° and angular resolutions of >2 cycles/deg in the center of the image. At the moment, the chip dimensions and pixel size limit the overall systems dimensions and our optical performance, whereas future devices can become smaller than 300 mm × 300 mm × 200 mm in volume and, at the same time, transfer images with higher resolution. The method thus enables considerably smaller imaging systems as compared to the state of the art.”
The science isn’t perfect yet; according to David J. Brady of Duke University, to get optimally clear images without any distortion would require using multiple types of plastic to print each lens. Unfortunately, while multi-material 3D printing is becoming more sophisticated, it’s still not possible to 3D print such small components in more than one material. It wouldn’t be surprising, though, to see the technology progress to that point before long.
“Further improvements would include antireflection coatings on the lenses, either by coatings or by nanostructuring; the use of triplets or more lens elements for aberration correction; and the inclusion of absorbing aperture stops,” the researchers add.
Additional authors of the study include Simon Thiele, Kathrin Arzenbacher, Timo Gissibl, and Alois M. Herkommer, who collaborated on a similar research project last year. You can access the full publication here. Discuss in the 3D Printed Lenses forum at 3DPB.com.
