While the Army publicizes a lot of their 3D printing initiatives, that doesn’t mean that similar advancements are not occurring within the other branches of the U.S. Military. Without a doubt, 3D printing is being used to some extent within all 5 divisions of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Back in May, Marine Captain William Mahoney’s nose landing gear failed on his AV-8B Harrier fighter jet. He was forced to make a very unique vertical landing, to rest the nose of the aircraft on top of a stool, aboard the USS Bataan (LHD5) aircraft carrier. In the video below, you can see Mahoney landing the plane in the same way we are used to seeing helicopters land.
Doug Greenwood, an aerospace engineer, as well as other workers on the Bataan, dismantled the nose cone of the aircraft. “The hard landing damaged a portion of one of the structural frames in the nose cone,” Greenwood explained.
The team of technicians decided that the best course of action would be to remove the damaged section and then replace it with a matching section that could be cut out from a spare frame at the Fleet Readiness Center East. “Sheet metal reinforcements, called ‘doublers’ would be needed to mate the donor section with the undamaged portion of the frame, which remained in the aircraft,” Greenwood said. “The challenge for FRCE was to manufacture the reinforcement doublers and get them to the ship for the repair.”
Fortunately the technicians were up for this challenge. Using the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) CAD model, the team designed the forming tools in less than 48 hours, with one of the forming tools taking 5 hours, and the other 30 hours to completely 3D print. The tools were printed using a polycarbonate material, that features very high compressive strength. It can withstand pressures of up to 4,000 pounds per square inch.
“Using traditional, nondigital tool design and building processes, manufacture of the doublers would likely have taken two to three weeks,” Greenwood said. “Using the 3-D digital data and AM, time and cost were reduced significantly.”
Once the tools were finished 3D printing, they were used to form the flat patterns into the doubler parts. Once the forming process was complete, the parts were heated and then painted. All-in-all, it took just one week from the time the technicians recieved the OEM CAD model until the new parts were ready to be put onto the aircraft.
This goes to show you that the military has many uses for 3D printing. Without the technology, this process would have taken much longer, and cost tax payers more money. What do you think about the military’s use of 3D printing to repair this aircraft? Discuss in the AV-8B Harrier forum thread on 3DPB.com