Well, the short answer to the titular question is: no.
Sorry. However, some are suggesting that it could bring something akin to it in the form of an interactive virtual avatar that gives presence to those who have passed away. The idea behind this is that by collecting information that a person generated during their lifetime, a digital model of that person could be created that would be available for interaction even after that person no longer existed in the physical world.
In any case, lecturer Simon McKeown of Teesside University in the UK thinks that such a life database avatar might be part of our everyday experience of memory collection within the next fifty years. For as long as human beings have been able to handle the idea of object permanence, we have been seeking ways to remember those who are no longer with us, whether through tokens, drawings, photographs, videos, or any number of other methods of memory capture. Efforts have been made across time and culture to make contact with the dead (also a popular movie plot), but unless you possess the sixth sense, there is something stale about the images we have, even if they are moving pictures.
Advocates of this avatar-based approach to reviving the dead would like to see computers be able to create synthetic digital life in order to keep in touch with our lost loved ones. One of the factors that contributes to making this idea more than just a fantasy is the vast amount of data people are recording and sharing through social media. Combine this with advanced 3D modeling technology and we might even be able to create an avatar that could respond to new situations and continue to evolve.
McKeown’s efforts in this area have led to the development of a project he calls ‘Preserved Memories’ for which he boasts:
“In the future with Preserved Memories, you will never have to experience the loss of a loved one. You will be able to add to your family tree and select new family members, including famous faces and legends, all of whom will already know about you. Using emotion-sensitive human-computer interaction our artificially intelligent participants continue to acquire ongoing knowledge long after their death – they evolve digitally and do not die.”
It seems to me, however, that McKeown fundamentally misunderstands human attachment. After all, it isn’t the social media presence of my husband that endears him to me, it is his presence – the one thing that can never, ever be recreated. I’m not saying that this, what amounts to a long distance relationship, wouldn’t be something I might find comforting or appealing were he gone, but the idea that I would not experience loss simply because I could interact with an avatar makes me question not only McKeown’s sanity, but also his ability to form human bonds.