When it comes to innovation, some of the most technologically advanced objects still belong to nature. Over the centuries, many inventions have come about, by observing nature in its finest moments.
At the same time, other inventions have failed miserably because their inventors tried to mimic nature, in cases where it was not possible to do. Take for example, the countless number of times in the past, that people have tried to invent flying machines (airplanes) by mimicking the flapping motion of a bird’s wings. It simply did not work, because of general physics.
Scientists from Harvard University have scanned sections of shark skin, including their ultra fine denticles. They then printed out material that replicates its properties. A shark’s skin is very unique, in that it includes tiny little teeth-like scales (denticles) that help them propel themselves through the water, at relatively high speeds.
The researchers at Harvard University used highly sophisticated, precision based 3D printers to mimic the properties of shark skin, to the best of their ability. Even with today’s technology, the best that the team could do, was to print out imitation skin which included denticles that were ten times larger than real life shark denticles. However, the skin, featuring denticles 10 times larger than that of a real shark, showed tremendous results when put to the test. The researchers put the 3D printed skin onto flexible paddles, and found that they added an incredible 6.6% boost in swimming speed.
Now imagine, say 5 years down the road, scientists can print this skin-like material in proportions that equal that of real shark skin. Then imagine what this could mean for the technology of boat motors and propellers. If a boat’s propeller could be covered in this skin-like material, imagine how much more efficient it could be. Fuel efficiency for watercraft, such as boats, yachts, and ships is extraordinarily high when compared to that of automobiles. This could solve one of the major issues in water transportation today.
“Eventually this technology could be used to improve the efficiency of surfaces moving through water,” explained George Lauder, a member of the Harvard research team. “But a truly biomimetic shark skin swimming suit is unlikely to be on the cards for some time. ‘The manufacturing challenges are tremendous.”
With this said, there is no telling for sure how much more efficient the imitation shark skin would be, if scientists one day could get the proportions correct. A good hypothesis, however, would conclude that we could see much improved results over the 6.6% increase in speed that we saw with their current technology.
Discuss this new 3D printed imitation shark skin, and the influence that it could have on technology, in the shark skin discussion thread.
You May Also Like
3D Printing vs. CNC Machining
What’s the Best Way to Make Your Part? CNC machining is a common subtractive manufacturing technology. Unlike 3D printing, the process typically begins with a solid block of material (blank)...
PrintDry’s Vacuum Sealed Filament Container is the Smartest Yet
Quality 3D printing often relies on the quality of your filament. If left out in a room, moisture can seep into the material and cause issues with the printing process...
3D Printing News Briefs, July 11, 2021: Wohler’s Associates; Solvay, Ultimaker, and L’Oréal; America Makes & ODSA; BMW Group; Dartmouth College; BEAMIT & Elementum 3D; Covestro & Nexeo Plastics; Denizen
In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ll be telling you about the launch of an audio series and a competition, AM training and research efforts, materials, and more. Read on...
Tiertime Announces Large Format UP600 3D Printer
Tiertime has officially launched a large format addition to its UP line. At 500 x 400 x 600 mm (19.7 x 15.7 x 23.6 inches), the UP600’s build volume is...
View our broad assortment of in house and third party products.