NASA Successfully Tests 3D Printed Copper Combustion Chamber

IMTS

Share this Article

NASA is constantly bringing additive manufacturing into use on projects, whether it’s 3D printing rocket engine parts or launching 3D printed CubeSats into space. For several years, NASA has been working on a project involving building a completely 3D printed rocket engine. It won’t culminate in an engine that will actually go into space; rather, the goal is to show that 3D printing an engine can be done and that it could be done again in the future, changing the way that rocket engines are made and saving money, time, and resources.

The Low Cost Upper Stage-Class Propulsion Project involves using additive manufacturing to develop high-pressure/high-temperature combustion chambers and nozzles with copper alloys. In its latest development, NASA successfully hot-fire tested a combustion chamber, made using a new combination of 3D printing techniques, at the agency’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. The project is a joint effort between Marshall, Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.

“NASA continues to break barriers in advanced manufacturing by reducing time and costs involved in building rocket engine parts through additive manufacturing. We are excited about the progress of this project. We demonstrated that the E-Beam Free Form Fabrication produced combustion chamber jacket can protect the chamber liner from the pressures found in the combustion chamber,” said John Fikes, Project Manager for the Low Cost Upper Stage-Class Propulsion Project.

In 2015, NASA 3D printed the first-ever full-scale copper rocket engine part, a combustion chamber liner 3D printed at Marshall from a powdered copper alloy made by material scientists at Glenn. The combustion chamber liner was then sent to Langley, where E-Beam Free Form Fabrication Technology, a layer-additive process that uses an electron beam and wire to create metal structures, was used to deposit a nickel alloy onto the liner, forming the chamber jacket.

A copper lining is good for thermal conductivity, but it’s not very strong, hence the nickel alloy jacket, which strengthens it so that it can withstand the pressure contained in the chamber. This process eliminates the need for traditional techniques like brazing, meaning that the jacket could be made in hours rather than days or weeks. In addition, traditional processes would have required multiple welded parts, while E-Beam Free Form Fabrication Technology allowed it to be made in one piece.

The chamber was recently sent back to Marshall where it was installed in a test stand and fired at various power levels for durations of 2 to 30 seconds under conditions resembling an actual launch. The final test ran for a duration of 25 seconds under 100 percent power, and the chamber remained in great shape according to post-test data.

“Testing the chamber in flight-like conditions helps us continue to prove these revolutionary technologies. We are proud of the way the chamber preformed during this test and the capabilities here at Marshall that allow us to continue paving the way for advancements in additive manufacturing,” said Chris Protz, Engineering and Design Lead for the propulsion project.

The technology for the combustion chamber liner and its jacket will be incorporated into a new project called Rapid Analysis and Manufacturing Propulsion Technology, which aims to further improve production times and costs for thrust chamber assemblies.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

[Source/Images: NASA]

 

Share this Article


Recent News

Interview: Rethinking 3D Printing for High-Volume Production with Exentis

3D Printing Financials: Prodways’ Q1 2024 Revenue Drop and Accounting Overhaul



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Financials: Fathom Struggles in Financial Quicksand During Critical Transition

Facing a year of key transitions and financial pressures, Fathom (Nasdaq: FTHM) has filed its annual report for 2023 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The document outlines...

Latest Earnings Overview for Australian 3D Printing Firms Titomic and AML3D

Australian 3D printing manufacturing firms Titomic (ASX: TTT) and AML3D (ASX: AL3) reported their financial results for the period from July to December 2023, marking the first half of their...

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: April 7, 2024

Webinars and events in the 3D printing industry are picking back up this week! Sea-Air-Space is coming to Maryland, and SAE International is sponsoring a 3D Systems webinar about 3D...

3D Printing Financials: Unpacking Farsoon and BLT’s 2023 Performance

In the Chinese 3D printing industry, two companies, Farsoon (SHA: 688433) and Bright Laser Technologies, or BLT (SHA: 688333), have recently unveiled their full-year earnings for 2023. Farsoon reported increases...